tests: arch: arm_irq_vector_table: minor inline comment updates
Distinguish between nRF51/nRF52 and nRF53 platforms in the inline comments when definining the built-time asserts for the test. Signed-off-by: Ioannis Glaropoulos <Ioannis.Glaropoulos@nordicsemi.no>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ca4ca081ef
commit
7544823731
|
@ -17,14 +17,14 @@
|
|||
#define _ISR_OFFSET 0
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_SERIES_NRF51X) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_SERIES_NRF52X)
|
||||
/* The customized solution for nRF5X-based platforms
|
||||
* requires that the POWER_CLOCK_IRQn line equals 0.
|
||||
/* The customized solution for nRF51X-based and nRF52X-based
|
||||
* platforms requires that the POWER_CLOCK_IRQn line equals 0.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BUILD_ASSERT_MSG(POWER_CLOCK_IRQn == 0,
|
||||
"POWER_CLOCK_IRQn != 0. Consider rework manual vector table.");
|
||||
|
||||
/* The customized solution for nRF5X-based platforms
|
||||
* requires that the RTC1 IRQ line equals 17.
|
||||
/* The customized solution for nRF51X-based and nRF52X-based
|
||||
* platforms requires that the RTC1 IRQ line equals 17.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BUILD_ASSERT_MSG(RTC1_IRQn == 17,
|
||||
"RTC1_IRQn != 17. Consider rework manual vector table.");
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue