From 75448237311a397b76f60a9696210133308dffe9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ioannis Glaropoulos Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:23:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] tests: arch: arm_irq_vector_table: minor inline comment updates Distinguish between nRF51/nRF52 and nRF53 platforms in the inline comments when definining the built-time asserts for the test. Signed-off-by: Ioannis Glaropoulos --- .../arm/arm_irq_vector_table/src/arm_irq_vector_table.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/arch/arm/arm_irq_vector_table/src/arm_irq_vector_table.c b/tests/arch/arm/arm_irq_vector_table/src/arm_irq_vector_table.c index 16231c3beec..54fcbbf5076 100644 --- a/tests/arch/arm/arm_irq_vector_table/src/arm_irq_vector_table.c +++ b/tests/arch/arm/arm_irq_vector_table/src/arm_irq_vector_table.c @@ -17,14 +17,14 @@ #define _ISR_OFFSET 0 #if defined(CONFIG_SOC_SERIES_NRF51X) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_SERIES_NRF52X) -/* The customized solution for nRF5X-based platforms - * requires that the POWER_CLOCK_IRQn line equals 0. +/* The customized solution for nRF51X-based and nRF52X-based + * platforms requires that the POWER_CLOCK_IRQn line equals 0. */ BUILD_ASSERT_MSG(POWER_CLOCK_IRQn == 0, "POWER_CLOCK_IRQn != 0. Consider rework manual vector table."); -/* The customized solution for nRF5X-based platforms - * requires that the RTC1 IRQ line equals 17. +/* The customized solution for nRF51X-based and nRF52X-based + * platforms requires that the RTC1 IRQ line equals 17. */ BUILD_ASSERT_MSG(RTC1_IRQn == 17, "RTC1_IRQn != 17. Consider rework manual vector table.");