2009-02-17 09:45:57 +08:00
|
|
|
// The contents of this file are in the public domain. See LICENSE_FOR_EXAMPLE_PROGRAMS.txt
|
2009-01-23 10:38:20 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-17 08:12:46 +08:00
|
|
|
This is an example illustrating the use the general purpose non-linear
|
|
|
|
optimization routines from the dlib C++ Library.
|
2009-01-23 10:38:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-07 04:41:49 +08:00
|
|
|
The library provides implementations of the conjugate gradient,
|
2009-09-20 23:33:09 +08:00
|
|
|
BFGS, L-BFGS, and BOBYQA optimization algorithms. These algorithms allow
|
2009-09-07 04:41:49 +08:00
|
|
|
you to find the minimum of a function of many input variables.
|
2009-01-23 10:38:20 +08:00
|
|
|
This example walks though a few of the ways you might put these
|
|
|
|
routines to use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-08 22:32:13 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <dlib/optimization.h>
|
2009-01-23 10:38:20 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <iostream>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using namespace std;
|
|
|
|
using namespace dlib;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Here we just make a typedef for a variable length column vector of doubles.
|
|
|
|
typedef matrix<double,0,1> column_vector;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
// Below we create a few functions. When you get down into main() you will see that
|
|
|
|
// we can use the optimization algorithms to find the minimums of these functions.
|
|
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
double rosen ( const column_vector& m)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
This function computes what is known as Rosenbrock's function. It is
|
|
|
|
a function of two input variables and has a global minimum at (1,1).
|
|
|
|
So when we use this function to test out the optimization algorithms
|
|
|
|
we will see that the minimum found is indeed at the point (1,1).
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const double x = m(0);
|
|
|
|
const double y = m(1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// compute Rosenbrock's function and return the result
|
|
|
|
return 100.0*pow(y - x*x,2) + pow(1 - x,2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This is a helper function used while optimizing the rosen() function.
|
|
|
|
const column_vector rosen_derivative ( const column_vector& m)
|
|
|
|
/*!
|
|
|
|
ensures
|
|
|
|
- returns the gradient vector for the rosen function
|
|
|
|
!*/
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const double x = m(0);
|
|
|
|
const double y = m(1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// make us a column vector of length 2
|
|
|
|
column_vector res(2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// now compute the gradient vector
|
|
|
|
res(0) = -400*x*(y-x*x) - 2*(1-x); // derivative of rosen() with respect to x
|
|
|
|
res(1) = 200*(y-x*x); // derivative of rosen() with respect to y
|
|
|
|
return res;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-27 05:37:38 +08:00
|
|
|
// This function computes the Hessian matrix for the rosen() fuction. This is
|
|
|
|
// the matrix of second derivatives.
|
|
|
|
matrix<double> rosen_hessian (const column_vector& m)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const double x = m(0);
|
|
|
|
const double y = m(1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
matrix<double> res(2,2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// now compute the second derivatives
|
|
|
|
res(0,0) = 1200*x*x - 400*y + 2; // second derivative with respect to x
|
|
|
|
res(1,0) = res(0,1) = -400*x; // derivative with respect to x and y
|
|
|
|
res(1,1) = 200; // second derivative with respect to y
|
|
|
|
return res;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-23 10:38:20 +08:00
|
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class test_function
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
This object is an example of what is known as a "function object" in C++.
|
|
|
|
It is simply an object with an overloaded operator(). This means it can
|
|
|
|
be used in a way that is similar to a normal C function. The interesting
|
|
|
|
thing about this sort of function is that it can have state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this example, our test_function object contains a column_vector
|
|
|
|
as its state and it computes the mean squared error between this
|
|
|
|
stored column_vector and the arguments to its operator() function.
|
2010-04-24 04:52:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a very simple function, however, in general you could compute
|
2009-01-23 10:38:20 +08:00
|
|
|
any function you wanted here. An example of a typical use would be
|
2010-04-24 04:52:18 +08:00
|
|
|
to find the parameters of some regression function that minimized
|
2009-01-23 10:38:20 +08:00
|
|
|
the mean squared error on a set of data. In this case the arguments
|
|
|
|
to the operator() function would be the parameters of your regression
|
2010-04-24 04:52:18 +08:00
|
|
|
function. You would loop over all your data samples and compute the output
|
|
|
|
of the regression function for each data sample given the parameters and
|
|
|
|
return a measure of the total error. The dlib optimization functions
|
|
|
|
could then be used to find the parameters that minimized the error.
|
2009-01-23 10:38:20 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_function (
|
|
|
|
const column_vector& input
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
target = input;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
double operator() ( const column_vector& arg) const
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// return the mean squared error between the target vector and the input vector
|
|
|
|
return mean(squared(target-arg));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
column_vector target;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-27 05:37:38 +08:00
|
|
|
class rosen_model
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/*!
|
|
|
|
This object is a "function model" which can be used with the
|
|
|
|
find_min_trust_region() routine.
|
|
|
|
!*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
typedef ::column_vector column_vector;
|
|
|
|
typedef matrix<double> general_matrix;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
double operator() (
|
|
|
|
const column_vector& x
|
|
|
|
) const { return rosen(x); }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void get_derivative_and_hessian (
|
|
|
|
const column_vector& x,
|
|
|
|
column_vector& der,
|
|
|
|
general_matrix& hess
|
|
|
|
) const
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
der = rosen_derivative(x);
|
|
|
|
hess = rosen_hessian(x);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-23 10:38:20 +08:00
|
|
|
int main()
|
|
|
|
{
|
2009-12-05 08:54:12 +08:00
|
|
|
try
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// make a column vector of length 2
|
|
|
|
column_vector starting_point;
|
|
|
|
starting_point.set_size(2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Set the starting point to (4,8). This is the point the optimization algorithm
|
|
|
|
// will start out from and it will move it closer and closer to the function's
|
|
|
|
// minimum point. So generally you want to try and compute a good guess that is
|
|
|
|
// somewhat near the actual optimum value.
|
|
|
|
starting_point = 4, 8;
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-17 08:12:46 +08:00
|
|
|
// The first example below finds the minimum of the rosen() function and uses the
|
|
|
|
// analytical derivative computed by rosen_derivative(). Since it is very easy to
|
|
|
|
// make a mistake while coding a function like rosen_derivative() it is a good idea
|
|
|
|
// to compare your derivative function against a numerical approximation and see if
|
|
|
|
// the results are similar. If they are very different then you probably made a
|
|
|
|
// mistake. So the first thing we do is compare the results at a test point:
|
|
|
|
cout << "Difference between analytic derivative and numerical approximation of derivative: "
|
|
|
|
<< length(derivative(&rosen)(starting_point) - rosen_derivative(starting_point)) << endl;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cout << "Find the minimum of the rosen function()" << endl;
|
2009-12-05 08:54:12 +08:00
|
|
|
// Now we use the find_min() function to find the minimum point. The first argument
|
|
|
|
// to this routine is the search strategy we want to use. The second argument is the
|
2010-02-17 08:12:46 +08:00
|
|
|
// stopping strategy. Below I'm using the objective_delta_stop_strategy which just
|
2009-12-05 08:54:12 +08:00
|
|
|
// says that the search should stop when the change in the function being optimized
|
|
|
|
// is small enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The other arguments to find_min() are the function to be minimized, its derivative,
|
|
|
|
// then the starting point, and the last is an acceptable minimum value of the rosen()
|
|
|
|
// function. That is, if the algorithm finds any inputs to rosen() that gives an output
|
|
|
|
// value <= -1 then it will stop immediately. Usually you supply a number smaller than
|
|
|
|
// the actual global minimum. So since the smallest output of the rosen function is 0
|
|
|
|
// we just put -1 here which effectively causes this last argument to be disregarded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
find_min(bfgs_search_strategy(), // Use BFGS search algorithm
|
|
|
|
objective_delta_stop_strategy(1e-7), // Stop when the change in rosen() is less than 1e-7
|
|
|
|
&rosen, &rosen_derivative, starting_point, -1);
|
|
|
|
// Once the function ends the starting_point vector will contain the optimum point
|
|
|
|
// of (1,1).
|
2013-01-27 05:37:38 +08:00
|
|
|
cout << "rosen solution:\n" << starting_point << endl;
|
2009-12-05 08:54:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now lets try doing it again with a different starting point and the version
|
|
|
|
// of find_min() that doesn't require you to supply a derivative function.
|
|
|
|
// This version will compute a numerical approximation of the derivative since
|
|
|
|
// we didn't supply one to it.
|
|
|
|
starting_point = -94, 5.2;
|
|
|
|
find_min_using_approximate_derivatives(bfgs_search_strategy(),
|
|
|
|
objective_delta_stop_strategy(1e-7),
|
|
|
|
&rosen, starting_point, -1);
|
|
|
|
// Again the correct minimum point is found and stored in starting_point
|
2013-01-27 05:37:38 +08:00
|
|
|
cout << "rosen solution:\n" << starting_point << endl;
|
2009-12-05 08:54:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Here we repeat the same thing as above but this time using the L-BFGS
|
|
|
|
// algorithm. L-BFGS is very similar to the BFGS algorithm, however, BFGS
|
|
|
|
// uses O(N^2) memory where N is the size of the starting_point vector.
|
|
|
|
// The L-BFGS algorithm however uses only O(N) memory. So if you have a
|
|
|
|
// function of a huge number of variables the L-BFGS algorithm is probably
|
|
|
|
// a better choice.
|
2010-07-25 06:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
starting_point = 0.8, 1.3;
|
2009-12-05 08:54:12 +08:00
|
|
|
find_min(lbfgs_search_strategy(10), // The 10 here is basically a measure of how much memory L-BFGS will use.
|
2010-07-25 06:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
objective_delta_stop_strategy(1e-7).be_verbose(), // Adding be_verbose() causes a message to be
|
|
|
|
// printed for each iteration of optimization.
|
2009-12-05 08:54:12 +08:00
|
|
|
&rosen, &rosen_derivative, starting_point, -1);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-27 05:44:46 +08:00
|
|
|
cout << endl << "rosen solution: \n" << starting_point << endl;
|
2009-12-05 08:54:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
starting_point = -94, 5.2;
|
|
|
|
find_min_using_approximate_derivatives(lbfgs_search_strategy(10),
|
|
|
|
objective_delta_stop_strategy(1e-7),
|
|
|
|
&rosen, starting_point, -1);
|
2013-01-27 05:37:38 +08:00
|
|
|
cout << "rosen solution: \n"<< starting_point << endl;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-05 08:54:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-27 05:37:38 +08:00
|
|
|
// In many cases, it is useful if we also provide second derivative information
|
|
|
|
// to the optimizers. Two examples of how we can do that are shown below.
|
|
|
|
starting_point = 0.8, 1.3;
|
|
|
|
find_min(newton_search_strategy(&rosen_hessian),
|
|
|
|
objective_delta_stop_strategy(1e-7),
|
|
|
|
&rosen,
|
|
|
|
&rosen_derivative,
|
|
|
|
starting_point,
|
|
|
|
-1);
|
|
|
|
cout << "rosen solution: \n"<< starting_point << endl;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We can also use find_min_trust_region(), which is also a method which uses
|
|
|
|
// second derivatives. For some kinds of non-convex function it may be more
|
|
|
|
// reliable than using a newton_search_strategy with find_min().
|
|
|
|
starting_point = 0.8, 1.3;
|
|
|
|
find_min_trust_region(objective_delta_stop_strategy(1e-7),
|
|
|
|
rosen_model(),
|
|
|
|
starting_point,
|
|
|
|
10 // initial trust region radius
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
cout << "rosen solution: \n"<< starting_point << endl;
|
2009-12-05 08:54:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now lets look at using the test_function object with the optimization
|
|
|
|
// functions.
|
|
|
|
cout << "\nFind the minimum of the test_function" << endl;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
column_vector target;
|
|
|
|
target.set_size(4);
|
|
|
|
starting_point.set_size(4);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This variable will be used as the target of the test_function. So,
|
|
|
|
// our simple test_function object will have a global minimum at the
|
|
|
|
// point given by the target. We will then use the optimization
|
|
|
|
// routines to find this minimum value.
|
|
|
|
target = 3, 5, 1, 7;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// set the starting point far from the global minimum
|
|
|
|
starting_point = 1,2,3,4;
|
|
|
|
find_min_using_approximate_derivatives(bfgs_search_strategy(),
|
|
|
|
objective_delta_stop_strategy(1e-7),
|
|
|
|
test_function(target), starting_point, -1);
|
2010-11-10 07:02:00 +08:00
|
|
|
// At this point the correct value of (3,5,1,7) should be found and stored in starting_point
|
2013-01-27 05:44:46 +08:00
|
|
|
cout << "test_function solution:\n" << starting_point << endl;
|
2009-12-05 08:54:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now lets try it again with the conjugate gradient algorithm.
|
|
|
|
starting_point = -4,5,99,3;
|
|
|
|
find_min_using_approximate_derivatives(cg_search_strategy(),
|
|
|
|
objective_delta_stop_strategy(1e-7),
|
|
|
|
test_function(target), starting_point, -1);
|
2013-01-27 05:44:46 +08:00
|
|
|
cout << "test_function solution:\n" << starting_point << endl;
|
2009-12-05 08:54:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Finally, lets try the BOBYQA algorithm. This is a technique specially
|
|
|
|
// designed to minimize a function in the absence of derivative information.
|
|
|
|
// Generally speaking, it is the method of choice if derivatives are not available.
|
|
|
|
starting_point = -4,5,99,3;
|
|
|
|
find_min_bobyqa(test_function(target),
|
|
|
|
starting_point,
|
|
|
|
9, // number of interpolation points
|
|
|
|
uniform_matrix<double>(4,1, -1e100), // lower bound constraint
|
|
|
|
uniform_matrix<double>(4,1, 1e100), // upper bound constraint
|
|
|
|
10, // initial trust region radius
|
|
|
|
1e-6, // stopping trust region radius
|
|
|
|
100 // max number of objective function evaluations
|
|
|
|
);
|
2013-01-27 05:44:46 +08:00
|
|
|
cout << "test_function solution:\n" << starting_point << endl;
|
2009-09-20 23:33:09 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-05 08:54:12 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
catch (std::exception& e)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
cout << e.what() << endl;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2009-01-23 10:38:20 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|