471 lines
18 KiB
ReStructuredText
471 lines
18 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. _release_process:
|
|
|
|
Release Process
|
|
###############
|
|
|
|
The Zephyr project releases on a time-based cycle, rather than a feature-driven
|
|
one. Zephyr releases represent an aggregation of the work of many contributors,
|
|
companies, and individuals from the community.
|
|
|
|
A time-based release process enables the Zephyr project to provide users with a
|
|
balance of the latest technologies and features and excellent overall quality. A
|
|
roughly 4-month release cycle allows the project to coordinate development of
|
|
the features that have actually been implemented, allowing the project to
|
|
maintain the quality of the overall release without delays because of one or two
|
|
features that are not ready yet.
|
|
|
|
The Zephyr release model is loosely based on the Linux kernel model:
|
|
|
|
- Release tagging procedure:
|
|
|
|
- linear mode on main branch,
|
|
- release branches for maintenance after release tagging.
|
|
- Each release period will consist of a merge window period followed by one or
|
|
more release candidates on which only stabilization changes, bug fixes, and
|
|
documentation can be merged in.
|
|
|
|
- Merge window mode: all changes are accepted (subject to approval from the
|
|
respective maintainers.)
|
|
- When the merge window is closed, the release owner lays a vN-rc1 tag and the
|
|
tree enters the release candidate phase
|
|
- CI sees the tag, builds and runs tests; QA analyses the report from the
|
|
build and test run and gives an ACK/NAK to the build
|
|
- The release owner, with QA and any other needed input, determines if the
|
|
release candidate is a go for release
|
|
- If it is a go for a release, the release owner lays a tag release vN at the
|
|
same point
|
|
- Development on new features continues in topic branches. Once features are
|
|
ready, they are submitted to mainline during the merge window period and after
|
|
the release is tagged.
|
|
|
|
.. figure:: release_cycle.png
|
|
:align: center
|
|
:alt: Release Cycle
|
|
:figclass: align-center
|
|
:width: 80%
|
|
|
|
Release Cycle
|
|
|
|
Merge Window
|
|
*************
|
|
|
|
A relatively straightforward discipline is followed with regard to the merging
|
|
of patches for each release. At the beginning of each development cycle, the
|
|
"merge window" is said to be open. At that time, code which is deemed to be
|
|
sufficiently stable (and which is accepted by the development community) is
|
|
merged into the mainline tree. The bulk of changes for a new development cycle
|
|
(and all of the major changes) will be merged during this time.
|
|
|
|
The merge window lasts for approximately two months. At the end of this time,
|
|
the release owner will declare that the window is closed and release the first
|
|
of the release candidates. For the codebase release which is destined to be
|
|
0.4.0, for example, the release which happens at the end of the merge window
|
|
will be called 0.4.0-rc1. The -rc1 release is the signal that the time to merge
|
|
new features has passed, and that the time to stabilize the next release of the
|
|
code base has begun.
|
|
|
|
Over the next weeks, only patches which fix problems should be submitted to the
|
|
mainline. On occasion, a more significant change will be allowed, but such
|
|
occasions are rare and require a TSC approval (Change Control Board). As a
|
|
general rule, if you miss the merge window for a given feature, the best thing
|
|
to do is to wait for the next development cycle. (An occasional exception is
|
|
made for drivers for previously unsupported hardware; if they do not touch any
|
|
other in-tree code, they cannot cause regressions and should be safe to add at
|
|
any time).
|
|
|
|
As fixes make their way into the mainline, the patch rate will slow over time.
|
|
The mainline release owner releases new -rc drops once or twice a week; a normal
|
|
series will get up to somewhere between -rc4 and -rc6 before the code base is
|
|
considered to be sufficiently stable and the quality metrics have been achieved
|
|
at which point the final 0.4.x release is made.
|
|
|
|
At that point, the whole process starts over again.
|
|
|
|
Here is the description of the various moderation levels:
|
|
|
|
- Low:
|
|
|
|
- Major New Features
|
|
- Bug Fixes
|
|
- Refactoring
|
|
- Structure/Directory Changes
|
|
- Medium:
|
|
|
|
- Bug Fixes, all priorities
|
|
- Enhancements
|
|
- Minor "self-contained" New Features
|
|
- High:
|
|
|
|
- Bug Fixes: P1 and P2
|
|
- Documentation + Test Coverage
|
|
|
|
.. _release_quality_criteria:
|
|
|
|
Release Quality Criteria
|
|
************************
|
|
|
|
The current backlog of prioritized bugs shall be used as a quality metric to
|
|
gate the final release. The following counts shall be used:
|
|
|
|
.. csv-table:: Bug Count Release Thresholds
|
|
:header: "High", "Medium", "Low"
|
|
:widths: auto
|
|
|
|
|
|
"0","<20","<50"
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
The "low" bug count target of <50 will be a phased appoach starting with 150
|
|
for release 2.4.0, 100 for release 2.5.0, and 50 for release 2.6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Releases
|
|
*********
|
|
|
|
The following syntax should be used for releases and tags in Git:
|
|
|
|
- Release [Major].[Minor].[Patch Level]
|
|
- Release Candidate [Major].[Minor].[Patch Level]-rc[RC Number]
|
|
- Tagging:
|
|
|
|
- v[Major].[Minor].[Patch Level]-rc[RC Number]
|
|
- v[Major].[Minor].[Patch Level]
|
|
- v[Major].[Minor].99 - A tag applied to main branch to signify that work on
|
|
v[Major].[Minor+1] has started. For example, v1.7.99 will be tagged at the
|
|
start of v1.8 process. The tag corresponds to
|
|
VERSION_MAJOR/VERSION_MINOR/PATCHLEVEL macros as defined for a
|
|
work-in-progress main branch version. Presence of this tag allows generation of
|
|
sensible output for "git describe" on main branch, as typically used for
|
|
automated builds and CI tools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. figure:: release_flow.png
|
|
:align: center
|
|
:alt: Releases
|
|
:figclass: align-center
|
|
:width: 80%
|
|
|
|
Zephyr Code and Releases
|
|
|
|
Long Term Support (LTS)
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
Long-term support releases are designed to be supported and maintained
|
|
for an extended period and is the recommended release for
|
|
products and the auditable branch used for certification.
|
|
|
|
An LTS release is defined as:
|
|
|
|
- **Product focused**
|
|
- **Extended Stabilisation period**: Allow for more testing and bug fixing
|
|
- **Stable APIs**
|
|
- **Quality Driven Process**
|
|
- **Long Term**: Maintained for an extended period of time (at least 2.5 years)
|
|
overlapping previous LTS release for at least half a year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Focused
|
|
+++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
Zephyr LTS is the recommended release for product makers with an extended
|
|
support and maintenance which includes general stability and bug fixes,
|
|
security fixes.
|
|
|
|
An LTS includes both mature and new features. API and feature maturity is
|
|
documented and tracked. The footprint and scope of mature and stable APIs expands
|
|
as we move from one LTS to the next giving users access to bleading edge features
|
|
and new hardware while keeping a stable foundation that evolves over time.
|
|
|
|
Extended Stabilisation Period
|
|
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
Zephyr LTS development cycle differs from regular releases and has an extended
|
|
stabilization period. Feature freeze of regular releases happens 3-4 weeks
|
|
before the scheduled release date. The stabilisation period for LTS is extended
|
|
by 3 weeks with the feature freeze occurring 6-7 weeks before the anticipated
|
|
release date. The time between code freeze and release date is extended in this case.
|
|
|
|
Stable APIs
|
|
+++++++++++
|
|
|
|
Zephyr LTS provides a stable and long-lived foundation for developing
|
|
products. To guarantee stability of the APIs and the implementation of such
|
|
APIs it is required that any release software that makes the core of the OS
|
|
went through the Zephyr API lifecycle and stabilised over at least 2 releases.
|
|
This guarantees that we release many of the highlighted and core features with
|
|
mature and well-established implementations with stable APIs that are
|
|
supported during the lifetime of the release LTS.
|
|
|
|
- API Freeze (LTS - 2)
|
|
|
|
- All stable APIs need to be frozen 2 releases before an LTS. APIs can be extended
|
|
with additional features, but the core implementation is not modified. This
|
|
is valid for the following subsystems for example:
|
|
|
|
- Device Drivers (i2c.h, spi.h)...
|
|
- Kernel (k_*):
|
|
- OS services (logging,debugging, ..)
|
|
- DTS: API and bindings stability
|
|
- Kconfig
|
|
|
|
- New APIs for experimental features can be added at any time as long as they
|
|
are standalone and documented as experimental or unstable features/APIs.
|
|
- Feature Freeze (LTS - 1)
|
|
- No new features or overhaul/restructuring of code covering major LTS features.
|
|
|
|
- Kernel + Base OS
|
|
- Additional advertised LTS features
|
|
|
|
- Auxiliary features on top of and/or extending the base OS and advertised LTS features
|
|
can be added at any time and should be marked as experimental if applicable
|
|
|
|
Quality Driven Process
|
|
++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
The Zephyr project follows industry standards and processes with the goal of
|
|
providing a quality oriented releases. This is achieved by providing the
|
|
following products to track progress, integrity and quality of the software
|
|
components provided by the project:
|
|
|
|
- Compliance with pubished coding guidelines, style guides and naming
|
|
conventions and documentation of deviations.
|
|
- Regular static analysis on the complete tree using available commercial and
|
|
open-source tools and documentation of deviations and false positives.
|
|
- Documented components and APIS
|
|
- Requirements Catalog
|
|
- Verification Plans
|
|
- Verification Reports
|
|
- Coverage Reports
|
|
- Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM)
|
|
- SPDX License Reports
|
|
|
|
Each release is created with the above products to document the quality and the
|
|
state of the software when it was released.
|
|
|
|
Long Term Support and Maintenance
|
|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
A Zephyr LTS release is published every 2 years and is branched and maintained
|
|
independently from the main tree for at least 2.5 years after it was
|
|
released. Support and maintenance for an LTS release stops at least half a year
|
|
after the following LTS release is published.
|
|
|
|
.. figure:: lts.png
|
|
:align: center
|
|
:alt: Long Term Support Release
|
|
:figclass: align-center
|
|
:width: 80%
|
|
|
|
Long Term Support Release
|
|
|
|
Changes and fixes flow in both directions. However, changes from main branch to an
|
|
LTS branch will be limited to fixes that apply to both branches and for existing
|
|
features only.
|
|
|
|
All fixes for an LTS branch that apply to the mainline tree shall be submitted to
|
|
mainline tree as well.
|
|
|
|
Auditable Code Base
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
An auditable code base is to be established from a defined subset of Zephyr OS
|
|
features and will be limited in scope. The LTS, development tree, and the
|
|
auditable code bases shall be kept in sync after the audit branch is created,
|
|
but with a more rigorous process in place for adding new features into the audit
|
|
branch used for certification.
|
|
|
|
This process will be applied before new features move into the
|
|
auditable code base.
|
|
|
|
The initial and subsequent certification targets will be decided by the Zephyr project
|
|
governing board.
|
|
|
|
Processes to achieve selected certification will be determined by the Security and
|
|
Safety Working Groups and coordinated with the TSC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release Procedure
|
|
******************
|
|
|
|
This section documents the Release manager responsibilities so that it serves as
|
|
a knowledge repository for Release managers.
|
|
|
|
Milestones
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
The following graphic shows the timeline of phases and milestones associated
|
|
with each release:
|
|
|
|
.. figure:: milestones.jpg
|
|
:align: center
|
|
:alt: Release Milestones
|
|
:figclass: align-center
|
|
:width: 80%
|
|
|
|
Release milestones
|
|
|
|
This shows how the phases and milestones of one release overlap with those of
|
|
the next release:
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. figure:: milestones2.jpg
|
|
:align: center
|
|
:alt: Release Milestones
|
|
:figclass: align-center
|
|
:width: 80%
|
|
|
|
Release milestones with planning
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. csv-table:: Milestone Description
|
|
:header: "Milestone", "Description", "Definition"
|
|
:widths: auto
|
|
|
|
|
|
"P0","Planning Kickoff","Start Entering Requirements"
|
|
"P1","","TSC Agrees on Major Features and Schedule"
|
|
"M0","Merge Window Open","All features, Sized, and AssignedMerge Window Is Opened"
|
|
"M1","M1 Checkpoint","Major Features Ready for Code Reviews |br| Test Plans Reviewed and Approved"
|
|
"M2","Feature Merge Window Close","Feature Freeze |br| Feature Development Complete (including Code Reviews and Unit Tests Passing) |br| P1 Stories Implemented |br| Feature Merge Window Is Closed |br| Test Development Complete |br| Technical Documentation Created/Updated and Ready for Review |br| CCB Control Starts"
|
|
"M3","Code Freeze","Code Freeze |br| RC3 Tagged and Built"
|
|
"M4","Release","TSC Reviews the Release Criteria Report and Approves Release
|
|
|br| Final RC Tagged |br| Make the Release"
|
|
|
|
Release Checklist
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
Each release has a GitHub issue associated with it that contains the full
|
|
checklist. After a release is complete, a checklist for the next release is
|
|
created.
|
|
|
|
Tagging
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
The final release and each release candidate shall be tagged using the following
|
|
steps:
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
Tagging needs to be done via explicit git commands and not via GitHub's release
|
|
interface. The GitHub release interface does not generate annotated tags (it
|
|
generates 'lightweight' tags regardless of release or pre-release). You should
|
|
also upload your gpg public key to your GitHub account, since the instructions
|
|
below involve creating signed tags. However, if you do not have a gpg public
|
|
key you can opt to remove the ``-s`` option from the commands below.
|
|
|
|
.. tabs::
|
|
|
|
.. tab:: Release Candidate
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
This section uses tagging 1.11.0-rc1 as an example, replace with
|
|
the appropriate release candidate version.
|
|
|
|
#. Update the version variables in the :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file
|
|
located in the root of the Git repository to match the version for
|
|
this release candidate. The ``EXTRAVERSION`` variable is used to
|
|
identify the rc[RC Number] value for this candidate::
|
|
|
|
EXTRAVERSION = rc1
|
|
|
|
#. Post a PR with the updated :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file using
|
|
``release: Zephyr 1.11.0-rc1`` as the commit subject. Merge
|
|
the PR after successful CI.
|
|
#. Tag and push the version, using an annotated tag::
|
|
|
|
$ git pull
|
|
$ git tag -s -m "Zephyr 1.11.0-rc1" v1.11.0-rc1
|
|
$ git push git@github.com:zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr.git v1.11.0-rc1
|
|
|
|
#. Once the tag is pushed, a github action will create a draft release
|
|
in Github with a shortlog since the last tag. The action will also
|
|
create a SPDX manifest of the Zephyr tree and will add the file as an
|
|
asset in the release.
|
|
|
|
Go to the draft release that was created and edit as needed. If this
|
|
step fails for a reason, it can be done manually following the steps
|
|
below:
|
|
|
|
#. Create a shortlog of changes between the previous release (use
|
|
rc1..rc2 between release candidates)::
|
|
|
|
$ git shortlog v1.10.0..v1.11.0-rc1
|
|
|
|
#. Find the new tag at the top of the releases page and edit the release
|
|
with the ``Edit tag`` button with the following:
|
|
|
|
* Name it ``Zephyr 1.11.0-rc1``
|
|
* Copy the shortlog into the release notes textbox (*don't forget
|
|
to quote it properly so it shows as unformatted text in Markdown*)
|
|
* Check the "This is a pre-release" checkbox
|
|
|
|
#. Send an email to the mailing lists (``announce`` and ``devel``)
|
|
with a link to the release
|
|
|
|
.. tab:: Final Release
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
This section uses tagging 1.11.0 as an example, replace with the
|
|
appropriate final release version.
|
|
|
|
When all final release criteria has been met and the final release notes
|
|
have been approved and merged into the repository, the final release version
|
|
will be set and repository tagged using the following procedure:
|
|
|
|
#. Update the version variables in the :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file
|
|
located in the root of the Git repository. Set ``EXTRAVERSION``
|
|
variable to an empty string to indicate final release::
|
|
|
|
EXTRAVERSION =
|
|
|
|
#. Post a PR with the updated :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file using
|
|
``release: Zephyr 1.11.0`` as the commit subject. Merge
|
|
the PR after successful CI.
|
|
#. Tag and push the version, using two annotated tags::
|
|
|
|
$ git pull
|
|
$ git tag -s -m "Zephyr 1.11.0" v1.11.0
|
|
$ git push git@github.com:zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr.git v1.11.0
|
|
|
|
# This is the tag that will represent the release on GitHub, so that
|
|
# the file you can download is named ``zephyr-v1.11.0.zip`` and not
|
|
# just ``v1.11.0.zip``
|
|
$ git tag -s -m "Zephyr 1.11.0" zephyr-v1.11.0
|
|
$ git push git@github.com:zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr.git zephyr-v1.11.0
|
|
|
|
#. Find the new ``zephyr-v1.11.0`` tag at the top of the releases page
|
|
and edit the release with the ``Edit tag`` button with the following:
|
|
|
|
* Name it ``Zephyr 1.11.0``
|
|
* Copy the full content of ``docs/releases/release-notes-1.11.rst``
|
|
into the release notes textbox
|
|
|
|
#. Send an email to the mailing lists (``announce`` and ``devel``) with a link
|
|
to the release
|
|
|
|
Listing all closed GitHub issues
|
|
=================================
|
|
|
|
The release notes for a final release contain the list of GitHub issues that
|
|
have been closed during the development process of that release.
|
|
|
|
In order to obtain the list of issues closed during the release development
|
|
cycle you can do the following:
|
|
|
|
#. Look for the last release before the current one and find the day it was
|
|
tagged::
|
|
|
|
$ git show -s --format=%ci zephyr-v1.10.0
|
|
tag zephyr-v1.10.0
|
|
Tagger: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@linaro.org>
|
|
|
|
Zephyr 1.10.0
|
|
2017-12-08 13:32:22 -0600
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. Use available release tools to list all the issues that have been closed
|
|
between that date and the day of the release.
|