500 lines
19 KiB
ReStructuredText
500 lines
19 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. _release_process:
|
|
|
|
Release Process
|
|
###############
|
|
|
|
The Zephyr project releases on a time-based cycle, rather than a feature-driven
|
|
one. Zephyr releases represent an aggregation of the work of many contributors,
|
|
companies, and individuals from the community.
|
|
|
|
A time-based release process enables the Zephyr project to provide users with a
|
|
balance of the latest technologies and features and excellent overall quality. A
|
|
roughly 4-month release cycle allows the project to coordinate development of
|
|
the features that have actually been implemented, allowing the project to
|
|
maintain the quality of the overall release without delays because of one or two
|
|
features that are not ready yet.
|
|
|
|
The Zephyr release model was loosely based on the Linux kernel model:
|
|
|
|
- Release tagging procedure:
|
|
|
|
- linear mode on main branch,
|
|
- release branches for maintenance after release tagging.
|
|
- Each release period will consist of a development phase followed by a
|
|
stabilization phase. Release candidates will be tagged during the
|
|
stabilization phase. During the stabilization phase, only stabilization
|
|
changes such as bug fixes and documentation will be merged unless granted a
|
|
special exemption by the Technical Steering Committee.
|
|
|
|
- Development phase: all changes are considered and merged, subject to
|
|
approval from the respective maintainers.
|
|
- Stabilisation phase: the release manager creates a vN-rc1 tag and the tree
|
|
enters the stabilization phase
|
|
- CI sees the tag, builds and runs tests; Test teams analyse the report from the
|
|
build and test run and give an ACK/NAK to the build
|
|
- The release owner, with test teams and any other needed input, determines if the
|
|
release candidate is a go for release
|
|
- If it is a go for a release, the release owner lays a tag release vN at the
|
|
same point
|
|
|
|
.. figure:: release_cycle.svg
|
|
:align: center
|
|
:alt: Release Cycle
|
|
:figclass: align-center
|
|
:width: 80%
|
|
|
|
Release Cycle
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
The milestones for the current major version can be found on the
|
|
`Official GitHub Wiki <https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/wiki/Release-Management>`_.
|
|
Information on previous releases can be found :ref:`here <zephyr_release_notes>`.
|
|
|
|
Development Phase
|
|
*****************
|
|
|
|
A relatively straightforward discipline is followed with regard to the merging
|
|
of patches for each release. At the beginning of each development cycle, the
|
|
main branch is said to be open for development. At that time, code which is deemed to be
|
|
sufficiently stable (and which is accepted by the maintainers and the wide community) is
|
|
merged into the mainline tree. The bulk of changes for a new development cycle
|
|
(and all of the major changes) will be merged during this time.
|
|
|
|
The development phase lasts for approximately three months. At the end of this time,
|
|
the release owner will declare that the development phase is over and releases the first
|
|
of the release candidates. For the codebase release which is destined to be
|
|
3.1.0, for example, the release which happens at the end of the development phase
|
|
will be called 3.1.0-rc1. The -rc1 release is the signal that the time to merge
|
|
new features has passed, and that the time to stabilize the next release of the
|
|
code base has begun.
|
|
|
|
Stabilization Phase
|
|
*******************
|
|
|
|
Over the next weeks and depending on the release milestone, only stabilization,
|
|
cosmetic changes, tests, bug and doc fixes are allowed (See :ref:`table
|
|
<release_milestones>` below).
|
|
|
|
On occasion, more significant changes and new features will be allowed, but such
|
|
occasions are rare and require a TSC approval and a justification. As a general
|
|
rule, if you miss submitting your code during the development phase for a given
|
|
feature, the best thing to do is to wait for the next development cycle. (An
|
|
occasional exception is made for drivers for previously unsupported hardware; if
|
|
they do not touch any other in-tree code, they cannot cause regressions and
|
|
should be safe to add at any time).
|
|
|
|
As fixes make their way into the mainline, the patch rate will slow over time.
|
|
The mainline release owner releases new -rc drops once or twice a week; a normal
|
|
series will get up to somewhere between -rc4 and -rc6 before the code base is
|
|
considered to be sufficiently stable and the release criteria have been achieved
|
|
at which point the final 3.1.0 release is made.
|
|
|
|
At that point, the whole process starts over again.
|
|
|
|
.. _release_quality_criteria:
|
|
|
|
Release Criteria
|
|
****************
|
|
|
|
The main motivation is to clearly have the criteria in place that must be met
|
|
for a release. This will help define when a release is "done" in terms that most
|
|
people can understand and in ways that help new people to understand the process
|
|
and participate in creating successful releases:
|
|
|
|
- The release criteria documents all the requirements of our target audience for
|
|
each Zephyr release
|
|
- The target audiences for each release can be different, and may overlap
|
|
- The criteria at any given time are not set in stone: there may be requirements
|
|
that have been overlooked, or that are new, and in these cases, the criteria
|
|
should be expanded to ensure all needs are covered.
|
|
|
|
Below is the high level criteria to be met for each release:
|
|
|
|
- No blocker bugs / blocking issues
|
|
- All relevant tests shall pass on ``Tier 0`` platforms
|
|
- All relevant tests shall pass on Tier 0 and 1 platforms (at least 1 per
|
|
architecture/architecture variant/Hardware features)
|
|
- All applicable samples/tests shall build on Tiers 0, 1 and 2
|
|
- All high and critical static analysis and security issues addressed
|
|
- Release Notes are up-to-date.
|
|
|
|
Blocker Bugs
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
Blocker bug process kicks in during the release process and is in effect after the
|
|
feature freeze milestone. An issue labeled as a blocker practically blocks a
|
|
release from happening. All blocker bugs shall be resolved before a release is
|
|
created.
|
|
|
|
A fix for a bug that is granted ``blocker`` status can be merged to 'main' and included in
|
|
the release all the way until the final release date.
|
|
|
|
Bugs of moderate severity and higher that have impact on all users are typically
|
|
the candidates to be promoted to blocker bugs
|
|
|
|
Contributors and member of the release engineering team shall follow these
|
|
guidelines for release blocker bugs:
|
|
|
|
- Only mark bugs as blockers if the software (Zephyr) must not be released with
|
|
the bug present.
|
|
- All collaborators can add or remove blocking labels.
|
|
- Evaluate bugs as potential blockers based on their severity and prevalence.
|
|
- Provide detailed rationale whenever adding or removing a blocking label.
|
|
- Ensure all blockers have the milestone tagged.
|
|
- Release managers have final say on blocking status; contact them with any questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _release_milestones:
|
|
|
|
Release Milestones
|
|
*******************
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. list-table:: Release Milestones
|
|
:widths: 15 25 100 25
|
|
:header-rows: 1
|
|
|
|
* - Timeline
|
|
- Checkpoint
|
|
- Description
|
|
- Owner
|
|
* - T-5M
|
|
- Planning
|
|
- Finalize dates for release, Assign release owner and agree on project wide goals for this release.
|
|
- TSC
|
|
* - T-7W
|
|
- Review target milestones
|
|
- Finalize target milestones for features in flight.
|
|
- Release Engineering
|
|
* - T-4W
|
|
- Release Announcement
|
|
- Release owner announces feature freeze and timeline for release.
|
|
- Release Manager
|
|
* - T-3W
|
|
- Feature Freeze (RC1)
|
|
- No new features after RC1, ONLY stabilization and cosmetic changes, bug and doc
|
|
fixes are allowed. New tests for existing features are also allowed.
|
|
- Release Engineering
|
|
* - T-2W
|
|
- 2nd Release Candidate
|
|
- No new features after RC2, ONLY stabilization and cosmetic changes, bug and doc fixes are allowed.
|
|
- Release Manager
|
|
* - T-1W
|
|
- Hard Freeze (RC3)
|
|
- Only blocker bug fixes after RC3, documentation and changes to release notes are allowed.
|
|
Release notes need to be complete by this checkpoint. Release Criteria is
|
|
met.
|
|
- Release Manager
|
|
* - T-0W
|
|
- Release
|
|
-
|
|
- Release Manager
|
|
|
|
|
|
Releases
|
|
*********
|
|
|
|
The following syntax should be used for releases and tags in Git:
|
|
|
|
- Release [Major].[Minor].[Patch Level]
|
|
- Release Candidate [Major].[Minor].[Patch Level]-rc[RC Number]
|
|
- Tagging:
|
|
|
|
- v[Major].[Minor].[Patch Level]-rc[RC Number]
|
|
- v[Major].[Minor].[Patch Level]
|
|
- v[Major].[Minor].99 - A tag applied to main branch to signify that work on
|
|
v[Major].[Minor+1] has started. For example, v1.7.99 will be tagged at the
|
|
start of v1.8 process. The tag corresponds to
|
|
VERSION_MAJOR/VERSION_MINOR/PATCHLEVEL macros as defined for a
|
|
work-in-progress main branch version. Presence of this tag allows generation of
|
|
sensible output for "git describe" on main branch, as typically used for
|
|
automated builds and CI tools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. figure:: release_flow.png
|
|
:align: center
|
|
:alt: Releases
|
|
:figclass: align-center
|
|
:width: 80%
|
|
|
|
Zephyr Code and Releases
|
|
|
|
.. _release_process_lts:
|
|
|
|
Long Term Support (LTS)
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
Long-term support releases are designed to be supported and maintained
|
|
for an extended period and is the recommended release for
|
|
products and the auditable branch used for certification.
|
|
|
|
An LTS release is defined as:
|
|
|
|
- **Product focused**
|
|
- **Extended Stabilisation period**: Allow for more testing and bug fixing
|
|
- **Stable APIs**
|
|
- **Quality Driven Process**
|
|
- **Long Term**: Maintained for an extended period of time (at least 2.5 years)
|
|
overlapping previous LTS release for at least half a year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Focused
|
|
+++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
Zephyr LTS is the recommended release for product makers with an extended
|
|
support and maintenance which includes general stability and bug fixes,
|
|
security fixes.
|
|
|
|
An LTS includes both mature and new features. API and feature maturity is
|
|
documented and tracked. The footprint and scope of mature and stable APIs expands
|
|
as we move from one LTS to the next giving users access to bleeding edge features
|
|
and new hardware while keeping a stable foundation that evolves over time.
|
|
|
|
Extended Stabilisation Period
|
|
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
Zephyr LTS development cycle differs from regular releases and has an extended
|
|
stabilization period. Feature freeze of regular releases happens 3-4 weeks
|
|
before the scheduled release date. The stabilization period for LTS is extended
|
|
by 3 weeks with the feature freeze occurring 6-7 weeks before the anticipated
|
|
release date. The time between code freeze and release date is extended in this case.
|
|
|
|
Stable APIs
|
|
+++++++++++
|
|
|
|
Zephyr LTS provides a stable and long-lived foundation for developing
|
|
products. To guarantee stability of the APIs and the implementation of such
|
|
APIs it is required that any release software that makes the core of the OS
|
|
went through the Zephyr API lifecycle and stabilized over at least 2 releases.
|
|
This guarantees that we release many of the highlighted and core features with
|
|
mature and well-established implementations with stable APIs that are
|
|
supported during the lifetime of the release LTS.
|
|
|
|
- API Freeze (LTS - 2)
|
|
|
|
- All stable APIs need to be frozen 2 releases before an LTS. APIs can be extended
|
|
with additional features, but the core implementation is not modified. This
|
|
is valid for the following subsystems for example:
|
|
|
|
- Device Drivers (i2c.h, spi.h)...
|
|
- Kernel (k_*):
|
|
- OS services (logging,debugging, ..)
|
|
- DTS: API and bindings stability
|
|
- Kconfig
|
|
|
|
- New APIs for experimental features can be added at any time as long as they
|
|
are standalone and documented as experimental or unstable features/APIs.
|
|
- Feature Freeze (LTS - 1)
|
|
- No new features or overhaul/restructuring of code covering major LTS features.
|
|
|
|
- Kernel + Base OS
|
|
- Additional advertised LTS features
|
|
|
|
- Auxiliary features on top of and/or extending the base OS and advertised LTS features
|
|
can be added at any time and should be marked as experimental if applicable
|
|
|
|
Quality Driven Process
|
|
++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
The Zephyr project follows industry standards and processes with the goal of
|
|
providing a quality oriented releases. This is achieved by providing the
|
|
following products to track progress, integrity and quality of the software
|
|
components provided by the project:
|
|
|
|
- Compliance with published coding guidelines, style guides and naming
|
|
conventions and documentation of deviations.
|
|
- Static analysis reports
|
|
|
|
- Regular static analysis on the complete tree using available commercial and
|
|
open-source tools, and documentation of deviations and false positives.
|
|
|
|
- Documented components and APIS
|
|
- Requirements Catalog
|
|
- Verification Plans
|
|
- Verification Reports
|
|
- Coverage Reports
|
|
- Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM)
|
|
- SPDX License Reports
|
|
|
|
Each release is created with the above products to document the quality and the
|
|
state of the software when it was released.
|
|
|
|
Long Term Support and Maintenance
|
|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
A Zephyr LTS release is published every 2 years and is branched and maintained
|
|
independently from the main tree for at least 2.5 years after it was
|
|
released. Support and maintenance for an LTS release stops at least half a year
|
|
after the following LTS release is published.
|
|
|
|
.. figure:: lts.svg
|
|
:align: center
|
|
:alt: Long Term Support Release
|
|
:figclass: align-center
|
|
:width: 80%
|
|
|
|
Long Term Support Release
|
|
|
|
Changes and fixes flow in both directions. However, changes from main branch to an
|
|
LTS branch will be limited to fixes that apply to both branches and for existing
|
|
features only.
|
|
|
|
All fixes for an LTS branch that apply to the mainline tree shall be submitted to
|
|
mainline tree as well.
|
|
|
|
Auditable Code Base
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
An auditable code base is to be established from a defined subset of Zephyr OS
|
|
features and will be limited in scope. The LTS, development tree, and the
|
|
auditable code bases shall be kept in sync after the audit branch is created,
|
|
but with a more rigorous process in place for adding new features into the audit
|
|
branch used for certification.
|
|
|
|
This process will be applied before new features move into the
|
|
auditable code base.
|
|
|
|
The initial and subsequent certification targets will be decided by the Zephyr project
|
|
governing board.
|
|
|
|
Processes to achieve selected certification will be determined by the Security and
|
|
Safety Working Groups and coordinated with the TSC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hardware Support Tiers
|
|
***********************
|
|
|
|
Tier 0: Emulation Platforms
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
- Tests are both built and run in these platforms in CI, and therefore runtime
|
|
failures can block Pull Requests.
|
|
- Supported by the Zephyr project itself, commitment to fix bugs in releases.
|
|
- One Tier 0 platform is required for each new architecture.
|
|
- Bugs reported against platforms of this tier are to be evaluated and treated as
|
|
a general bug in Zephyr and should be dealt with the highest priority.
|
|
|
|
Tier 1: Supported Platforms
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
- Commitment from a specific team to run tests using twister device
|
|
testing for the "Zephyr compatibility test suite" (details TBD)
|
|
on a regular basis using open-source and publicly available drivers.
|
|
- Commitment to fix bugs in time for releases. Not supported by "Zephyr Project"
|
|
itself.
|
|
- General availability for purchase
|
|
- Bugs reported against platforms of this tier are to be evaluated and treated
|
|
as a general bug in Zephyr and should be dealt with medium to high priority.
|
|
|
|
Tier 2: Community Platforms
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
- Platform implementation is available in upstream, no commitment to testing,
|
|
may not be generally available.
|
|
- Has a dedicated maintainer who commits to respond to issues / review patches.
|
|
- Bugs reported against platforms of this tier are NOT considered as
|
|
a general bug in Zephyr.
|
|
|
|
Tier 3: Deprecated and unsupported Platforms
|
|
============================================
|
|
|
|
- Platform implementation is available, but no owner or unresponsive owner.
|
|
- No commitment to support is available.
|
|
- May be removed from upstream if no one works to bring it up to tier 2 or better.
|
|
- Bugs reported against platforms of this tier are NOT considered as
|
|
a general bug in Zephyr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release Procedure
|
|
******************
|
|
|
|
This section documents the Release manager responsibilities so that it serves as
|
|
a knowledge repository for Release managers.
|
|
|
|
Release Checklist
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
Each release has a GitHub issue associated with it that contains the full
|
|
checklist. After a release is complete, a checklist for the next release is
|
|
created.
|
|
|
|
Tagging
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
The final release and each release candidate shall be tagged using the following
|
|
steps:
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
Tagging needs to be done via explicit git commands and not via GitHub's release
|
|
interface. The GitHub release interface does not generate annotated tags (it
|
|
generates 'lightweight' tags regardless of release or pre-release). You should
|
|
also upload your gpg public key to your GitHub account, since the instructions
|
|
below involve creating signed tags. However, if you do not have a gpg public
|
|
key you can opt to remove the ``-s`` option from the commands below.
|
|
|
|
.. tabs::
|
|
|
|
.. tab:: Release Candidate
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
This section uses tagging 1.11.0-rc1 as an example, replace with
|
|
the appropriate release candidate version.
|
|
|
|
#. Update the version variables in the :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file
|
|
located in the root of the Git repository to match the version for
|
|
this release candidate. The ``EXTRAVERSION`` variable is used to
|
|
identify the rc[RC Number] value for this candidate::
|
|
|
|
EXTRAVERSION = rc1
|
|
|
|
#. Post a PR with the updated :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file using
|
|
``release: Zephyr 1.11.0-rc1`` as the commit subject. Merge
|
|
the PR after successful CI.
|
|
#. Tag and push the version, using an annotated tag::
|
|
|
|
$ git pull
|
|
$ git tag -s -m "Zephyr 1.11.0-rc1" v1.11.0-rc1
|
|
$ git push git@github.com:zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr.git v1.11.0-rc1
|
|
|
|
#. Send an email to the mailing lists (``announce`` and ``devel``)
|
|
with a link to the release
|
|
|
|
.. tab:: Final Release
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
This section uses tagging 1.11.0 as an example, replace with the
|
|
appropriate final release version.
|
|
|
|
When all final release criteria has been met and the final release notes
|
|
have been approved and merged into the repository, the final release version
|
|
will be set and repository tagged using the following procedure:
|
|
|
|
#. Update the version variables in the :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file
|
|
located in the root of the Git repository. Set ``EXTRAVERSION``
|
|
variable to an empty string to indicate final release::
|
|
|
|
EXTRAVERSION =
|
|
|
|
#. Post a PR with the updated :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file using
|
|
``release: Zephyr 1.11.0`` as the commit subject. Merge
|
|
the PR after successful CI.
|
|
#. Tag and push the version, using two annotated tags::
|
|
|
|
$ git pull
|
|
$ git tag -s -m "Zephyr 1.11.0" v1.11.0
|
|
$ git push git@github.com:zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr.git v1.11.0
|
|
|
|
#. Find the new ``v1.11.0`` tag at the top of the releases page and
|
|
edit the release with the ``Edit tag`` button with the following:
|
|
|
|
* Copy the overview of ``docs/releases/release-notes-1.11.rst``
|
|
into the release notes textbox and link to the full release notes
|
|
file on docs.zephyrproject.org.
|
|
|
|
#. Send an email to the mailing lists (``announce`` and ``devel``) with a link
|
|
to the release
|