796 lines
29 KiB
ReStructuredText
796 lines
29 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. _contribute_guidelines:
|
|
|
|
Contribution Guidelines
|
|
#######################
|
|
|
|
As an open-source project, we welcome and encourage the community to submit
|
|
patches directly to the project. In our collaborative open source environment,
|
|
standards and methods for submitting changes help reduce the chaos that can result
|
|
from an active development community.
|
|
|
|
This document explains how to participate in project conversations, log bugs
|
|
and enhancement requests, and submit patches to the project so your patch will
|
|
be accepted quickly in the codebase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _help:
|
|
|
|
Asking for Help
|
|
***************
|
|
|
|
You can ask for help on a mailing list or on Slack. Please send bug reports and
|
|
feature requests to GitHub.
|
|
|
|
* **Mailing Lists**: users@lists.zephyrproject.org is usually the right list to
|
|
ask for help. `Search archives and sign up here`_.
|
|
* **Slack**: Zephyr's workspace is https://zephyrproject.slack.com; you can
|
|
register with this `Slack invite`_.
|
|
* **GitHub**: Use `GitHub issues`_ for bugs and feature requests.
|
|
|
|
How to Ask
|
|
===========
|
|
|
|
.. important::
|
|
|
|
Please search this documentation and the mailing list archives first. Your
|
|
question may have an answer there.
|
|
|
|
Don't just say "this isn't working" or ask "is this working?". Include as much
|
|
detail as you can about:
|
|
|
|
#. What you want to do
|
|
#. What you tried (commands you typed, etc.)
|
|
#. What happened (output of each command, etc.)
|
|
|
|
Use Copy/Paste
|
|
==============
|
|
|
|
Please **copy/paste text** instead of taking a picture or a screenshot of it.
|
|
Text includes source code, terminal commands, and their output.
|
|
|
|
Doing this makes it easier for people to help you, and also helps other users
|
|
search the archives.
|
|
|
|
When copy/pasting more than 5 lines of text into Slack, create a `snippet`_.
|
|
|
|
.. _Search archives and sign up here: https://lists.zephyrproject.org/g/users
|
|
.. _Slack invite: https://tinyurl.com/y5glwylp
|
|
.. _GitHub issues: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues
|
|
.. _snippet: https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/204145658-Create-a-snippet
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
*********
|
|
|
|
Licensing is very important to open source projects. It helps ensure the
|
|
software continues to be available under the terms that the author desired.
|
|
|
|
.. _Apache 2.0 license:
|
|
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/master/LICENSE
|
|
|
|
.. _GitHub repo: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr
|
|
|
|
Zephyr uses the `Apache 2.0 license`_ (as found in the LICENSE file in
|
|
the project's `GitHub repo`_) to strike a balance between open
|
|
contribution and allowing you to use the software however you would like
|
|
to. The Apache 2.0 license is a permissive open source license that
|
|
allows you to freely use, modify, distribute and sell your own products
|
|
that include Apache 2.0 licensed software. (For more information about
|
|
this, check out articles such as `Why choose Apache 2.0 licensing`_ and
|
|
`Top 10 Apache License Questions Answered`_).
|
|
|
|
.. _Why choose Apache 2.0 licensing:
|
|
https://www.zephyrproject.org/faqs/#1571346989065-9216c551-f523
|
|
|
|
.. _Top 10 Apache License Questions Answered:
|
|
https://www.whitesourcesoftware.com/whitesource-blog/top-10-apache-license-questions-answered/
|
|
|
|
A license tells you what rights you have as a developer, as provided by the
|
|
copyright holder. It is important that the contributor fully understands the
|
|
licensing rights and agrees to them. Sometimes the copyright holder isn't the
|
|
contributor, such as when the contributor is doing work on behalf of a
|
|
company.
|
|
|
|
Components using other Licenses
|
|
===============================
|
|
|
|
There are some imported or reused components of the Zephyr project that
|
|
use other licensing, as described in :ref:`Zephyr_Licensing`.
|
|
|
|
Importing code into the Zephyr OS from other projects that use a license
|
|
other than the Apache 2.0 license needs to be fully understood in
|
|
context and approved by the Zephyr governing board.
|
|
|
|
By carefully reviewing potential contributions and also enforcing a
|
|
:ref:`DCO` for contributed code, we can ensure that
|
|
the Zephyr community can develop products with the Zephyr Project
|
|
without concerns over patent or copyright issues.
|
|
|
|
See :ref:`external-contributions` for more information about
|
|
this contributing and review process for imported components.
|
|
|
|
.. only:: latex
|
|
|
|
.. toctree::
|
|
:maxdepth: 1
|
|
|
|
../LICENSING.rst
|
|
|
|
.. _DCO:
|
|
|
|
Developer Certification of Origin (DCO)
|
|
***************************************
|
|
|
|
To make a good faith effort to ensure licensing criteria are met, the Zephyr
|
|
project requires the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO) process to be
|
|
followed.
|
|
|
|
The DCO is an attestation attached to every contribution made by every
|
|
developer. In the commit message of the contribution, (described more fully
|
|
later in this document), the developer simply adds a ``Signed-off-by``
|
|
statement and thereby agrees to the DCO.
|
|
|
|
When a developer submits a patch, it is a commitment that the contributor has
|
|
the right to submit the patch per the license. The DCO agreement is shown
|
|
below and at http://developercertificate.org/.
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: none
|
|
|
|
Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
|
|
|
|
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
|
|
|
|
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
|
|
have the right to submit it under the open source license
|
|
indicated in the file; or
|
|
|
|
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the
|
|
best of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open
|
|
source license and I have the right under that license to
|
|
submit that work with modifications, whether created in whole
|
|
or in part by me, under the same open source license (unless
|
|
I am permitted to submit under a different license), as
|
|
Indicated in the file; or
|
|
|
|
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
|
|
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
|
|
it.
|
|
|
|
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
|
|
are public and that a record of the contribution (including
|
|
all personal information I submit with it, including my
|
|
sign-off) is maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed
|
|
consistent with this project or the open source license(s)
|
|
involved.
|
|
|
|
DCO Sign-Off Methods
|
|
====================
|
|
|
|
The DCO requires a sign-off message in the following format appear on each
|
|
commit in the pull request::
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Zephyrus Zephyr <zephyrus@zephyrproject.org>
|
|
|
|
The DCO text can either be manually added to your commit body, or you can add
|
|
either ``-s`` or ``--signoff`` to your usual Git commit commands. If you forget
|
|
to add the sign-off you can also amend a previous commit with the sign-off by
|
|
running ``git commit --amend -s``. If you've pushed your changes to GitHub
|
|
already you'll need to force push your branch after this with ``git push -f``.
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
=====
|
|
|
|
Any contributions made as part of submitted pull requests are considered free
|
|
for the Project to use. Developers are permitted to cherry-pick patches that
|
|
are included in pull requests submitted by other contributors. It is expected
|
|
that
|
|
|
|
* the content of the patches will not be substantially modified,
|
|
* the cherry-picked commits or portions of a commit shall preserve the original
|
|
sign-off messages and the author identity.
|
|
|
|
:ref:`modifying_contributions` describes additional recommended policies
|
|
around working with contributions submitted by other developers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prerequisites
|
|
*************
|
|
|
|
.. _Zephyr Project website: https://zephyrproject.org
|
|
|
|
As a contributor, you'll want to be familiar with the Zephyr project, how to
|
|
configure, install, and use it as explained in the `Zephyr Project website`_
|
|
and how to set up your development environment as introduced in the Zephyr
|
|
:ref:`getting_started`.
|
|
|
|
You should be familiar with common developer tools such as Git and CMake, and
|
|
platforms such as GitHub.
|
|
|
|
If you haven't already done so, you'll need to create a (free) GitHub account
|
|
on https://github.com and have Git tools available on your development system.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
The Zephyr development workflow supports all 3 major operating systems
|
|
(Linux, macOS, and Windows) but some of the tools used in the sections below
|
|
are only available on Linux and macOS. On Windows, instead of running these
|
|
tools yourself, you will need to rely on the Continuous Integration (CI)
|
|
service ``buildkite``, which runs automatically on GitHub when you submit
|
|
your Pull Request (PR). You can see any failure results in the Shippable
|
|
details link near the end of the PR conversation list. See
|
|
`Continuous Integration`_ for more information
|
|
|
|
Repository layout
|
|
*****************
|
|
|
|
To clone the main Zephyr Project repositories use the instructions in
|
|
:ref:`get_the_code`.
|
|
|
|
The Zephyr project directory structure is described in :ref:`source_tree_v2`
|
|
documentation. In addition to the Zephyr kernel itself, you'll also find the
|
|
sources for technical documentation, sample code, supported board
|
|
configurations, and a collection of subsystem tests. All of these are
|
|
available for developers to contribute to and enhance.
|
|
|
|
Pull Requests and Issues
|
|
************************
|
|
|
|
.. _Zephyr Project Issues: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues
|
|
|
|
.. _open pull requests: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pulls
|
|
|
|
.. _Zephyr devel mailing list: https://lists.zephyrproject.org/g/devel
|
|
|
|
.. _Zephyr Slack channel: https://zephyrproject.slack.com
|
|
|
|
Before starting on a patch, first check in our issues `Zephyr Project Issues`_
|
|
system to see what's been reported on the issue you'd like to address. Have a
|
|
conversation on the `Zephyr devel mailing list`_ (or the the `Zephyr Slack channel`_)
|
|
to see what others think of your issue (and proposed solution). You may find
|
|
others that have encountered the issue you're finding, or that have similar
|
|
ideas for changes or additions. Send a message to the `Zephyr devel mailing list`_
|
|
to introduce and discuss your idea with the development community.
|
|
|
|
It's always a good practice to search for existing or related issues before
|
|
submitting your own. When you submit an issue (bug or feature request), the
|
|
triage team will review and comment on the submission, typically within a few
|
|
business days.
|
|
|
|
You can find all `open pull requests`_ on GitHub and open `Zephyr Project
|
|
Issues`_ in Github issues.
|
|
|
|
.. _Continuous Integration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tools and Git Setup
|
|
*******************
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
The name in the commit message ``Signed-off-by:`` line and your email must
|
|
match the change authorship information. Make sure your :file:`.gitconfig`
|
|
is set up correctly:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: console
|
|
|
|
git config --global user.name "David Developer"
|
|
git config --global user.email "david.developer@company.com"
|
|
|
|
gitlint
|
|
=========
|
|
|
|
When you submit a pull request to the project, a series of checks are
|
|
performed to verify your commit messages meet the requirements. The same step
|
|
done during the CI process can be performed locally using the the ``gitlint``
|
|
command.
|
|
|
|
Run ``gitlint`` locally in your tree and branch where your patches have been
|
|
committed:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: console
|
|
|
|
gitlint
|
|
|
|
Note, gitlint only checks HEAD (the most recent commit), so you should run it
|
|
after each commit, or use the ``--commits`` option to specify a commit range
|
|
covering all the development patches to be submitted.
|
|
|
|
twister
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
twister does not currently run on Windows.
|
|
|
|
To verify that your changes did not break any tests or samples, please run the
|
|
``twister`` script locally before submitting your pull request to GitHub. To
|
|
run the same tests the CI system runs, follow these steps from within your
|
|
local Zephyr source working directory:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: console
|
|
|
|
source zephyr-env.sh
|
|
./scripts/twister
|
|
|
|
The above will execute the basic twister script, which will run various
|
|
kernel tests using the QEMU emulator. It will also do some build tests on
|
|
various samples with advanced features that can't run in QEMU.
|
|
|
|
We highly recommend you run these tests locally to avoid any CI
|
|
failures.
|
|
|
|
uncrustify
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
The `uncrustify tool <https://sourceforge.net/projects/uncrustify>`_ can
|
|
be helpful to quickly reformat large amounts of new source code to our
|
|
`Coding Style`_
|
|
standards together with a configuration file we've provided:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: bash
|
|
|
|
# On Linux/macOS
|
|
uncrustify --replace --no-backup -l C -c $ZEPHYR_BASE/.uncrustify.cfg my_source_file.c
|
|
# On Windows
|
|
uncrustify --replace --no-backup -l C -c %ZEPHYR_BASE%\.uncrustify.cfg my_source_file.c
|
|
|
|
But note that you should not use uncrustify to reformat existing Zephyr code,
|
|
or to modify files in which you only introduce a small fix. This would create a
|
|
lot of unwelcome extra changed lines.
|
|
|
|
On Linux systems, you can install uncrustify with
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: bash
|
|
|
|
sudo apt install uncrustify
|
|
|
|
For Windows installation instructions see the `sourceforge listing for
|
|
uncrustify <https://sourceforge.net/projects/uncrustify>`_.
|
|
|
|
.. _coding_style:
|
|
|
|
Coding Style
|
|
************
|
|
|
|
Use these coding guidelines to ensure that your development complies with the
|
|
project's style and naming conventions.
|
|
|
|
.. _Linux kernel coding style:
|
|
https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html
|
|
|
|
In general, follow the `Linux kernel coding style`_, with the
|
|
following exceptions:
|
|
|
|
* Add braces to every ``if``, ``else``, ``do``, ``while``, ``for`` and
|
|
``switch`` body, even for single-line code blocks. Use the ``--ignore BRACES``
|
|
flag to make *checkpatch* stop complaining.
|
|
* Use spaces instead of tabs to align comments after declarations, as needed.
|
|
* Use C89-style single line comments, ``/* */``. The C99-style single line
|
|
comment, ``//``, is not allowed.
|
|
* Use ``/** */`` for doxygen comments that need to appear in the documentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Linux kernel GPL-licensed tool ``checkpatch`` is used to check
|
|
coding style conformity.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
checkpatch does not currently run on Windows.
|
|
|
|
Checkpatch is available in the scripts directory. To invoke it when committing
|
|
code, make the file *$ZEPHYR_BASE/.git/hooks/pre-commit* executable and edit
|
|
it to contain:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: bash
|
|
|
|
#!/bin/sh
|
|
set -e exec
|
|
exec git diff --cached | ${ZEPHYR_BASE}/scripts/checkpatch.pl -
|
|
|
|
Instead of running checkpatch at each commit, you may prefer to run it only
|
|
before pushing on zephyr repo. To do this, make the file
|
|
*$ZEPHYR_BASE/.git/hooks/pre-push* executable and edit it to contain:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: bash
|
|
|
|
#!/bin/sh
|
|
remote="$1"
|
|
url="$2"
|
|
|
|
z40=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
|
|
|
|
echo "Run push hook"
|
|
|
|
while read local_ref local_sha remote_ref remote_sha
|
|
do
|
|
args="$remote $url $local_ref $local_sha $remote_ref $remote_sha"
|
|
exec ${ZEPHYR_BASE}/scripts/series-push-hook.sh $args
|
|
done
|
|
|
|
exit 0
|
|
|
|
If you want to override checkpatch verdict and push you branch despite reported
|
|
issues, you can add option --no-verify to the git push command.
|
|
|
|
A more complete alternative to this is using check_compliance.py script from
|
|
ci-tools repo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coding Guidelines
|
|
*****************
|
|
|
|
Beyond the :ref:`coding_style` that Zephyr enforces for all code that is
|
|
submitted for inclusion, the project targets compliance with a series of
|
|
coding guidelines. Refer to the :ref:`coding_guidelines` section of the
|
|
documentation for additional details.
|
|
|
|
.. _Contribution Tools:
|
|
|
|
.. _Contribution workflow:
|
|
|
|
Contribution Workflow
|
|
*********************
|
|
|
|
One general practice we encourage, is to make small,
|
|
controlled changes. This practice simplifies review, makes merging and
|
|
rebasing easier, and keeps the change history clear and clean.
|
|
|
|
When contributing to the Zephyr Project, it is also important you provide as much
|
|
information as you can about your change, update appropriate documentation,
|
|
and test your changes thoroughly before submitting.
|
|
|
|
The general GitHub workflow used by Zephyr developers uses a combination of
|
|
command line Git commands and browser interaction with GitHub. As it is with
|
|
Git, there are multiple ways of getting a task done. We'll describe a typical
|
|
workflow here:
|
|
|
|
.. _Create a Fork of Zephyr:
|
|
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#fork-destination-box
|
|
|
|
#. `Create a Fork of Zephyr`_
|
|
to your personal account on GitHub. (Click on the fork button in the top
|
|
right corner of the Zephyr project repo page in GitHub.)
|
|
|
|
#. On your development computer, change into the :file:`zephyr` folder that was
|
|
created when you :ref:`obtained the code <get_the_code>`::
|
|
|
|
cd zephyrproject/zephyr
|
|
|
|
Rename the default remote pointing to the `upstream repository
|
|
<https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr>`_ from ``origin`` to
|
|
``upstream``::
|
|
|
|
git remote rename origin upstream
|
|
|
|
Let Git know about the fork you just created, naming it ``origin``::
|
|
|
|
git remote add origin https://github.com/<your github id>/zephyr
|
|
|
|
and verify the remote repos::
|
|
|
|
git remote -v
|
|
|
|
The output should look similar to::
|
|
|
|
origin https://github.com/<your github id>/zephyr (fetch)
|
|
origin https://github.com/<your github id>/zephyr (push)
|
|
upstream https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr (fetch)
|
|
upstream https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr (push)
|
|
|
|
#. Create a topic branch (off of master) for your work (if you're addressing
|
|
an issue, we suggest including the issue number in the branch name)::
|
|
|
|
git checkout master
|
|
git checkout -b fix_comment_typo
|
|
|
|
Some Zephyr subsystems do development work on a separate branch from
|
|
master so you may need to indicate this in your checkout::
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b fix_out_of_date_patch origin/net
|
|
|
|
#. Make changes, test locally, change, test, test again, ... (Check out the
|
|
prior chapter on `twister`_ as well).
|
|
|
|
#. When things look good, start the pull request process by adding your changed
|
|
files::
|
|
|
|
git add [file(s) that changed, add -p if you want to be more specific]
|
|
|
|
You can see files that are not yet staged using::
|
|
|
|
git status
|
|
|
|
#. Verify changes to be committed look as you expected::
|
|
|
|
git diff --cached
|
|
|
|
#. Commit your changes to your local repo::
|
|
|
|
git commit -s
|
|
|
|
The ``-s`` option automatically adds your ``Signed-off-by:`` to your commit
|
|
message. Your commit will be rejected without this line that indicates your
|
|
agreement with the `DCO`_. See the `Commit Guidelines`_ section for
|
|
specific guidelines for writing your commit messages.
|
|
|
|
#. Push your topic branch with your changes to your fork in your personal
|
|
GitHub account::
|
|
|
|
git push origin fix_comment_typo
|
|
|
|
#. In your web browser, go to your forked repo and click on the
|
|
``Compare & pull request`` button for the branch you just worked on and
|
|
you want to open a pull request with.
|
|
|
|
#. Review the pull request changes, and verify that you are opening a
|
|
pull request for the appropriate branch. The title and message from your
|
|
commit message should appear as well.
|
|
|
|
#. If you're working on a subsystem branch that's not ``master``,
|
|
you may need to change the intended branch for the pull request
|
|
here, for example, by changing the base branch from ``master`` to ``net``.
|
|
|
|
#. GitHub will assign one or more suggested reviewers (based on the
|
|
CODEOWNERS file in the repo). If you are a project member, you can
|
|
select additional reviewers now too.
|
|
|
|
#. Click on the submit button and your pull request is sent and awaits
|
|
review. Email will be sent as review comments are made, or you can check
|
|
on your pull request at https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pulls.
|
|
|
|
#. While you're waiting for your pull request to be accepted and merged, you
|
|
can create another branch to work on another issue. (Be sure to make your
|
|
new branch off of master and not the previous branch.)::
|
|
|
|
git checkout master
|
|
git checkout -b fix_another_issue
|
|
|
|
and use the same process described above to work on this new topic branch.
|
|
|
|
#. If reviewers do request changes to your patch, you can interactively rebase
|
|
commit(s) to fix review issues. In your development repo::
|
|
|
|
git fetch --all
|
|
git rebase --ignore-whitespace upstream/master
|
|
|
|
The ``--ignore-whitespace`` option stops ``git apply`` (called by rebase)
|
|
from changing any whitespace. Continuing::
|
|
|
|
git rebase -i <offending-commit-id>^
|
|
|
|
In the interactive rebase editor, replace ``pick`` with ``edit`` to select
|
|
a specific commit (if there's more than one in your pull request), or
|
|
remove the line to delete a commit entirely. Then edit files to fix the
|
|
issues in the review.
|
|
|
|
As before, inspect and test your changes. When ready, continue the
|
|
patch submission::
|
|
|
|
git add [file(s)]
|
|
git rebase --continue
|
|
|
|
Update commit comment if needed, and continue::
|
|
|
|
git push --force origin fix_comment_typo
|
|
|
|
By force pushing your update, your original pull request will be updated
|
|
with your changes so you won't need to resubmit the pull request.
|
|
|
|
.. note:: While amending commits and force pushing is a common review model
|
|
outside GitHub, and the one recommended by Zephyr, it's not the main
|
|
model supported by GitHub. Forced pushes can cause unexpected behavior,
|
|
such as not being able to use "View Changes" buttons except for the last
|
|
one - GitHub complains it can't find older commits. You're also not
|
|
always able to compare the latest reviewed version with the latest
|
|
submitted version. When rewriting history GitHub only guarantees access
|
|
to the latest version.
|
|
|
|
#. If the CI run fails, you will need to make changes to your code in order
|
|
to fix the issues and amend your commits by rebasing as described above.
|
|
Additional information about the CI system can be found in
|
|
`Continuous Integration`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commit Guidelines
|
|
*****************
|
|
|
|
Changes are submitted as Git commits. Each commit message must contain:
|
|
|
|
* A short and descriptive subject line that is less than 72 characters,
|
|
followed by a blank line. The subject line must include a prefix that
|
|
identifies the subsystem being changed, followed by a colon, and a short
|
|
title, for example: ``doc: update wiki references to new site``.
|
|
(If you're updating an existing file, you can use
|
|
``git log <filename>`` to see what developers used as the prefix for
|
|
previous patches of this file.)
|
|
|
|
* A change description with your logic or reasoning for the changes, followed
|
|
by a blank line.
|
|
|
|
* A Signed-off-by line, ``Signed-off-by: <name> <email>`` typically added
|
|
automatically by using ``git commit -s``
|
|
|
|
* If the change addresses an issue, include a line of the form::
|
|
|
|
Fixes #<issue number>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All changes and topics sent to GitHub must be well-formed, as described above.
|
|
|
|
Commit Message Body
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
When editing the commit message, please briefly explain what your change
|
|
does and why it's needed. A change summary of ``"Fixes stuff"`` will be rejected.
|
|
|
|
.. warning::
|
|
An empty change summary body is not permitted. Even for trivial changes, please
|
|
include a summary body in the commit message.
|
|
|
|
The description body of the commit message must include:
|
|
|
|
* **what** the change does,
|
|
* **why** you chose that approach,
|
|
* **what** assumptions were made, and
|
|
* **how** you know it works -- for example, which tests you ran.
|
|
|
|
For examples of accepted commit messages, you can refer to the Zephyr GitHub
|
|
`changelog <https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commits/master>`__.
|
|
|
|
Other Commit Expectations
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
* Commits must build cleanly when applied on top of each other, thus avoiding
|
|
breaking bisectability.
|
|
|
|
* Commits must pass all CI checks (see `Continuous Integration`_ for more
|
|
information)
|
|
|
|
* Each commit must address a single identifiable issue and must be
|
|
logically self-contained. Unrelated changes should be submitted as
|
|
separate commits.
|
|
|
|
* You may submit pull request RFCs (requests for comments) to send work
|
|
proposals, progress snapshots of your work, or to get early feedback on
|
|
features or changes that will affect multiple areas in the code base.
|
|
|
|
* When major new functionality is added, tests for the new functionality MUST be
|
|
added to the automated test suite. All new APIs MUST be documented and tested
|
|
and tests MUST cover at least 80% of the added functionality using the code
|
|
coverage tool and reporting provided by the project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submitting Proposals
|
|
====================
|
|
|
|
You can request a new feature or submit a proposal by submitting an issue to
|
|
our GitHub Repository.
|
|
If you would like to implement a new feature, please submit an issue with a
|
|
proposal (RFC) for your work first, to be sure that we can use it. Please
|
|
consider what kind of change it is:
|
|
|
|
* For a Major Feature, first open an issue and outline your proposal so that it
|
|
can be discussed. This will also allow us to better coordinate our efforts,
|
|
prevent duplication of work, and help you to craft the change so that it is
|
|
successfully accepted into the project. Providing the following information
|
|
will increase the chances of your issue being dealt with quickly:
|
|
|
|
* Overview of the Proposal
|
|
* Motivation for or Use Case
|
|
* Design Details
|
|
* Alternatives
|
|
* Test Strategy
|
|
|
|
* Small Features can be crafted and directly submitted as a Pull Request.
|
|
|
|
Identifying Contribution Origin
|
|
===============================
|
|
|
|
When adding a new file to the tree, it is important to detail the source of
|
|
origin on the file, provide attributions, and detail the intended usage. In
|
|
cases where the file is an original to Zephyr, the commit message should
|
|
include the following ("Original" is the assumption if no Origin tag is
|
|
present)::
|
|
|
|
Origin: Original
|
|
|
|
In cases where the file is :ref:`imported from an external project
|
|
<external-contributions>`, the commit message shall contain details regarding
|
|
the original project, the location of the project, the SHA-id of the origin
|
|
commit for the file and the intended purpose.
|
|
|
|
For example, a copy of a locally maintained import::
|
|
|
|
Origin: Contiki OS
|
|
License: BSD 3-Clause
|
|
URL: http://www.contiki-os.org/
|
|
commit: 853207acfdc6549b10eb3e44504b1a75ae1ad63a
|
|
Purpose: Introduction of networking stack.
|
|
|
|
For example, a copy of an externally maintained import in a module repository::
|
|
|
|
Origin: Tiny Crypt
|
|
License: BSD 3-Clause
|
|
URL: https://github.com/01org/tinycrypt
|
|
commit: 08ded7f21529c39e5133688ffb93a9d0c94e5c6e
|
|
Purpose: Introduction of TinyCrypt
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuous Integration (CI)
|
|
***************************
|
|
|
|
The Zephyr Project operates a Continuous Integration (CI) system that runs on
|
|
every Pull Request (PR) in order to verify several aspects of the PR:
|
|
|
|
* Git commit formatting
|
|
* Coding Style
|
|
* Twister builds for multiple architectures and boards
|
|
* Documentation build to verify any doc changes
|
|
|
|
CI is run both on the ``buildkite`` cloud service and Github Actions and it uses
|
|
the same tools described in the `Contribution Tools`_ section.
|
|
The CI results must be green indicating "All checks have passed" before
|
|
the Pull Request can be merged. CI is run when the PR is created, and
|
|
again every time the PR is modified with a commit.
|
|
|
|
The current status of the CI run can always be found at the bottom of the
|
|
GitHub PR page, below the review status. Depending on the success or failure
|
|
of the run you will see:
|
|
|
|
* "All checks have passed"
|
|
* "All checks have failed"
|
|
|
|
In case of failure you can click on the "Details" link presented below the
|
|
failure message in order to navigate to ``buildkite`` or ``Github Actions``
|
|
and inspect the results.
|
|
Once you click on the link you will be taken to the ``buildkite`` summary
|
|
results page where a table with all the different builds will be shown. To see
|
|
what build or test failed click on the row that contains the failed (i.e.
|
|
non-green) build and then click on the "Tests" tab to see the console output
|
|
messages indicating the failure.
|
|
|
|
The `builds@lists.zephyrproject.org mailing list
|
|
<https://lists.zephyrproject.org/g/builds>`_
|
|
archives the CI (buildkite) nightly build results.
|
|
|
|
Contributions to External Modules
|
|
**********************************
|
|
|
|
Follow the guidelines in the :ref:`modules` section for contributing
|
|
:ref:`new modules <submitting_new_modules>` and
|
|
submitting changes to :ref:`existing modules <changes_to_existing_module>`.
|
|
|
|
Contributing External Components
|
|
********************************
|
|
|
|
.. toctree::
|
|
:maxdepth: 1
|
|
|
|
external.rst
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution Roles and Responsibilities
|
|
***************************************
|
|
|
|
.. toctree::
|
|
:maxdepth: 1
|
|
|
|
modifying_contributions.rst
|
|
project_roles.rst
|
|
|
|
The Zephyr project defines a development process workflow using GitHub
|
|
**Issues** to track feature, enhancement, and bug reports together with GitHub
|
|
**Pull Requests** (PRs) for submitting and reviewing changes. Zephyr
|
|
community members work together to review these Issues and PRs, managing
|
|
feature enhancements and quality improvements of Zephyr through its regular
|
|
releases, as outlined in the
|
|
`program management overview <https://wiki.zephyrproject.org/Program-Management>`_.
|
|
|
|
We can only manage the volume of Issues and PRs, by requiring timely reviews,
|
|
feedback, and responses from the community and contributors, both for initial
|
|
submissions and for followup questions and clarifications. Read about the
|
|
project's :ref:`development processes and tools <dev-environment-and-tools>`
|
|
and specifics about :ref:`review timelines <review_time>` to learn about the
|
|
project's goals and guidelines for our active developer community.
|
|
|
|
:ref:`project_roles` describes in detail the Zephyr project roles and associated permissions
|
|
with respect to the development process workflow.
|