ffb9e0977d
This test seems a little confused. It does a POSIX usleep() for 90ms, then checks the time taken, and verifies that it was no less than... 91ms! On existing platforms, tick alignment makes sure that we always take a little longer, so this passes. But on high tick rate configurations we get it exactly right. And fail. Adjust the calibration to allow (exactly) 90ms sleeps. Also fixed a comment that described the wrong units. Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
common | ||
fs |