208 lines
7.2 KiB
ReStructuredText
208 lines
7.2 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. _reporting:
|
||
|
||
Security Vulnerability Reporting
|
||
################################
|
||
|
||
Introduction
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
Vulnerabilities to the Zephyr project may be reported via email to the
|
||
vulnerabilities@zephyrproject.org mailing list. These reports will be
|
||
acknowledged and analyzed by the security response team within 1 week.
|
||
Each vulnerability will be entered into the Zephyr Project security
|
||
advisory GitHub_. The original submitter will be granted permission to
|
||
view the issues that they have reported.
|
||
|
||
.. _GitHub: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security
|
||
|
||
Security Issue Management
|
||
=========================
|
||
|
||
Issues within this bug tracking system will transition through a
|
||
number of states according to this diagram:
|
||
|
||
.. graphviz::
|
||
|
||
digraph {
|
||
node [style = rounded];
|
||
init [shape = point];
|
||
New [shape = box];
|
||
Triage [shape = box];
|
||
{
|
||
rank = same;
|
||
rankdir = LR;
|
||
Assigned [shape = box];
|
||
Rejected [shape = box];
|
||
}
|
||
Review [shape = box];
|
||
Accepted [shape = box];
|
||
Public [shape = box];
|
||
|
||
init -> New;
|
||
New -> Triage;
|
||
Triage -> Rejected [dir = both];
|
||
Triage -> Assigned;
|
||
Assigned -> Review [dir = both];
|
||
Review -> Accepted;
|
||
Review -> Rejected;
|
||
Accepted -> Public;
|
||
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
- New: This state represents new reports that have been entered
|
||
directly by a reporter. When entered by the response team in
|
||
response to an email, the issue shall be transitioned directly to
|
||
Triage.
|
||
|
||
- Triage: This issue is awaiting Triage by the response team. The
|
||
response team will analyze the issue, determine a responsible
|
||
entity, assign it to that individual, and move the
|
||
issue to the Assigned state. Part of triage will be to set the
|
||
issue's priority.
|
||
|
||
- Assigned: The issue has been assigned, and is awaiting a fix by the
|
||
assignee.
|
||
|
||
- Review: Once there is a Zephyr pull request for the issue, the PR
|
||
link will be added to a comment in the issue, and the issue moved to
|
||
the Review state.
|
||
|
||
- Accepted: Indicates that this issue has been merged into the
|
||
appropriate branch within Zephyr.
|
||
|
||
- Public: The embargo period has ended. The issue will be made
|
||
publicly visible, the associated CVE updated, and the
|
||
vulnerabilities page in the docs updated to include the detailed
|
||
information.
|
||
|
||
The security advisories created are kept private, due to the
|
||
sensitive nature of security reports. The issues are only visible to
|
||
certain parties:
|
||
|
||
- Members of the PSIRT mailing list
|
||
|
||
- the reporter
|
||
|
||
- others, as proposed and ratified by the Zephyr Security
|
||
Subcommittee. In the general case, this will include:
|
||
|
||
- The code owner responsible for the fix.
|
||
|
||
- The Zephyr release owners for the relevant releases affected by
|
||
this vulnerability.
|
||
|
||
The Zephyr Security Subcommittee shall review the reported
|
||
vulnerabilities during any meeting with more than three people in
|
||
attendance. During this review, they shall determine if new issues
|
||
need to be embargoed.
|
||
|
||
The guideline for embargo will be based on: 1. Severity of the issue,
|
||
and 2. Exploitability of the issue. Issues that the subcommittee
|
||
decides do not need an embargo will be reproduced in the regular
|
||
Zephyr project bug tracking system.
|
||
|
||
Security sensitive vulnerabilities shall be made public after an
|
||
embargo period of at most 90 days. The intent is to allow 30 days
|
||
within the Zephyr project to fix the issues, and 60 days for external
|
||
parties building products using Zephyr to be able to apply and
|
||
distribute these fixes.
|
||
|
||
Fixes to the code shall be made through pull requests PR in the Zephyr
|
||
project github. Developers shall make an attempt to not reveal the
|
||
sensitive nature of what is being fixed, and shall not refer to CVE
|
||
numbers that have been assigned to the issue. The developer instead
|
||
should merely describe what has been fixed.
|
||
|
||
The security subcommittee will maintain information mapping embargoed
|
||
CVEs to these PRs (this information is within the Github security
|
||
adivisories), and produce regular reports of the state of security
|
||
issues.
|
||
|
||
Each issue that is considered a security vulnerability shall be
|
||
assigned a CVE number. As fixes are created, it may be necessary to
|
||
allocate additional CVE numbers, or to retire numbers that were
|
||
assigned.
|
||
|
||
Vulnerability Notification
|
||
==========================
|
||
|
||
Each Zephyr release shall contain a report of CVEs that were fixed in
|
||
that release. Because of the sensitive nature of these
|
||
vulnerabilities, the release shall merely include a list of CVEs that
|
||
have been fixed. After the embargo period, the vulnerabilities page
|
||
shall be updated to include additional details of these
|
||
vulnerabilities. The vulnerability page shall give credit to the
|
||
reporter(s) unless a reporter specifically requests anonymity.
|
||
|
||
The Zephyr project shall maintain a vulnerability-alerts mailing list.
|
||
This list will be seeded initially with a contact from each project
|
||
member. Additional parties can request to join this list by filling
|
||
out the form at the `Vulnerability Registry`_. These parties will be
|
||
vetted by the project director to determine that they have a
|
||
legimitate interest in knowing about security vulnerabilities during
|
||
the embargo period.
|
||
|
||
.. _Vulnerability Registry: https://www.zephyrproject.org/vulnerability-registry/
|
||
|
||
Periodically, the security subcommittee will send information to this
|
||
mailing list describing known embargoed issues, and their backport
|
||
status within the project. This information is intended to allow them
|
||
to determine if they need to backport these changes to any internal
|
||
trees.
|
||
|
||
When issues have been triaged, this list will be informed of:
|
||
|
||
- The Zephyr Project security advisory link (GitHub).
|
||
|
||
- The CVE number assigned.
|
||
|
||
- The subsystem involved.
|
||
|
||
- The severity of the issue.
|
||
|
||
After acceptance of a PR fixing the issue (merged), in addition to the
|
||
above, the list will be informed of:
|
||
|
||
- The association between the CVE number and the PR fixing it.
|
||
|
||
- Backport plans within the Zephyr project.
|
||
|
||
Backporting of Security Vulnerabilities
|
||
=======================================
|
||
|
||
Each security issue fixed within zephyr shall be backported to the
|
||
following releases:
|
||
|
||
- The current Long Term Stable (LTS) release.
|
||
|
||
- The most recent two releases.
|
||
|
||
The developer of the fix shall be responsible for any necessary
|
||
backports, and apply them to any of the above listed release branches,
|
||
unless the fix does not apply (the vulnerability was introduced after
|
||
this release was made).
|
||
|
||
Backports will be tracked on the security advisory.
|
||
|
||
Need to Know
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
Due to the sensitive nature of security vulnerabilities, it is
|
||
important to share details and fixes only with those parties that have
|
||
a need to know. The following parties will need to know details about
|
||
security vulnerabilities before the embargo period ends:
|
||
|
||
- Maintainers will have access to all information within their domain
|
||
area only.
|
||
|
||
- The current release manager, and the release manager for historical
|
||
releases affected by the vulnerability (see backporting above).
|
||
|
||
- The Project Security Incident Response (PSIRT) team will have full
|
||
access to information. The PSIRT is made up of representatives from
|
||
platinum members, and volunteers who do work on triage from other
|
||
members.
|
||
|
||
- As needed, release managers and maintainers may be invited to attend
|
||
additional security meetings to discuss vulnerabilities.
|