Use this short header style in all Kconfig files:
# <description>
# <copyright>
# <license>
...
Also change all <description>s from
# Kconfig[.extension] - Foo-related options
to just
# Foo-related options
It's clear enough that it's about Kconfig.
The <description> cleanup was done with this command, along with some
manual cleanup (big letter at the start, etc.)
git ls-files '*Kconfig*' | \
xargs sed -i -E '1 s/#\s*Kconfig[\w.-]*\s*-\s*/# /'
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <Ulf.Magnusson@nordicsemi.no>
Add a common definition for NUM_IRQS in arch/arm/core/Kconfig and
arch/riscv/Kconfig. That way, the type doesn't have to be given for
NUM_IRQS in all the Kconfig.defconfig files.
Trying to get rid of unnecessary "full" symbol definitions in
Kconfig.defconfig files, to make the organization clearer. It can also
help with finding unused symbols.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <Ulf.Magnusson@nordicsemi.no>
Same deal as in commit 7fdb525754 ("kconfig: Use 'default' instead of
'def_bool' in Kconfig.defconfig files"), but I hacked Kconfiglib to also
find cases where the type is given separately as e.g.
config FOO
int
default 3
Motivation (from a note in
https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/guides/kconfig/index.html):
For a symbol defined in multiple locations (e.g., in a
Kconfig.defconfig file in Zephyr), it is best to only give the
symbol type for the "base" definition of the symbol, and to use
'default' (instead of 'def_<type>' value) for the remaining
definitions. That way, if the base definition of the symbol is
removed, the symbol ends up without a type, which generates a
warning that points to the other definitions. That makes the extra
definitions easier to discover and remove.
It's also nice if 'def_bool' and the like turn into a semi-reliable flag
that the symbol is only defined in Kconfig.defconfig files. That might
be a sign that things could be cleaned up.
Will do a separate pass later to remove some symbols only defined in
Kconfig.defconfig files.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <Ulf.Magnusson@nordicsemi.no>
Move the SoC outside of the architecture tree and put them at the same
level as boards and architectures allowing both SoCs and boards to be
maintained outside the tree.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
Ulf Magnusson