In order to align with macros used to obtain a device reference (e.g.
DEVICE_DT_GET), align the PM macros to use "GET" instead of "REF". This
change should have low impact since no official release has gone out yet
with the "REF" macros.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
The pm_device_runtime_enable did not suspend devices, so it assumed that
the device was in a physically suspended state. This change makes sure
that device is left in a suspended state if the device is initially
active.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
In case runtime PM is not enabled (or not built-in), the get/put
functions always return 0 (instead of -ENOTSUP/-ENOSYS). When runtime PM
is disabled, a device is left into active state. Similarly, when device
runtime PM is not built-in, it is safe to assume that a device will
be active when it is called. If a user implements a custom solution, it
is its responsability to make sure that a device is active when using
it. For all these reasons, the -ENOTSUP/-ENOSYS are error codes that
should always be ignored by devices using get/put, since in practice it
means that: device is active, function is a no-op. The example below
illustrates how error handling is simplified:
```c
/* before: safe to ignore -ENOSYS/-ENOTSUP since device is active (we
* can continue)
*/
ret = pm_device_runtime_get(dev);
if ((ret < 0) && (ret != -ENOSYS) && (ret != -ENOTSUP)) {
return ret;
}
/* now */
ret = pm_device_runtime_get(dev);
if (ret < 0) {
return ret;
}
```
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
The device PM subsystem _depends_ on device, not vice-versa. Devices
only hold a reference to struct pm_device now, and initialize this
reference with the value provided in Z_DEVICE_DEFINE. This requirement
can be solved with a forward struct declaration, meaning there is no
need to include device PM headers.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
The test was done with one cpu in mind. In a SMP environment there is
race condition where the semaphor can be given before the other thread
take block waiting for it.
Fixes#40068
Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin@intel.com>
The PM callback is no longer referenced as "pm_control" but
"pm_action_cb", so reflect this new naming on the callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Move all PM device runtime API calls from pm_device* to the
pm_device_runtime* namespace.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Add a test for the device runtime API that makes sure most common usage
scenarios behave as expected:
- get + put
- get + asynchronous put until suspended
- get + asynchronous put + get (while suspend still ongoing)
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Anas Nashif