Errors has been ignored when using TLV writer to create/write object
instance/resources. Modify to propagate the error back to the caller.
To reproduce the issue, try to create IPSO light control object
instances twice. Since the default instance count is 1, the second one
should be rejected and responded w/ error. But the current
implementation will respond w/ 2.04.
Signed-off-by: Robert Chou <robert.ch.chou@acer.com>
We did not check the requested object/object instance/resource exists or
not before we adding an observer. Correct it by checking the existence
first.
Signed-off-by: Robert Chou <robert.ch.chou@acer.com>
We should stop sending out notification to the peer when the
object/object instances requested to be observed is removed
Signed-off-by: Robert Chou <robert.ch.chou@acer.com>
We were using sys_slist_remove() to remove object, object instance and
observer w/o passing the previous sys_snode_t to it (NULL).
This will instruct the function to treat the node as the list head and
result in unexpected behavior after the removal.
Correct it by using sys_slist_find_and_remove() or passing the previous
node to the function.
Signed-off-by: Robert Chou <robert.ch.chou@acer.com>
When a request demands to create a new object instance, it will search
whether the request object instance exists or not. However, current
implementation does not reset the lwm2m_engine_obj_inst at the time it
is deleted. It only removes the object instance from the sys list.
Correct the behavior by resetting both object instance and resource
instances at the time it's deleted. Also, consolidate function
lwm2m_delete_handler() and lwm2m_delete_obj_inst().
To reproduce the issue, try to create light control object instance
(/3301), delete the created instance and create it again. You shall find
following error message dumped.
> [ipso_light_control] [ERR] light_control_create: Can not create
instance - already existing: 0
> [lib/lwm2m_engine] [ERR] lwm2m_create_obj_inst: unable to create obj -
3311 instance 0
Signed-off-by: Robert Chou <robert.ch.chou@acer.com>
Per LwM2M spec (7.3.2.4 Operation on Object):
"If the payload (New Value) conveys an Object Instance ID in conflict
with one already present in the LwM2M Client, the complete request
MUST be rejected and a "Bad Request" error code MUST be sent back."
Let's do that.
Signed-off-by: Michael Scott <michael.scott@linaro.org>
Per LwM2M specification 7.3.2.4, "Optional Resources MAY be conveyed
in the "New Value" parameter as well; the LwM2M Client MAY ignore the
optional resources it doesn't support."
Update TLV/JSON writer to ignore error when object fields are not
found (treated as optional resource). This will allow the resources
supported being written.
Signed-off-by: Robert Chou <robert.ch.chou@acer.com>
[michael.scott@linaro.org: re-worked patch post addition of CREATE
operation.]
Signed-off-by: Michael Scott <michael.scott@linaro.org>
Prior to this patch, a CREATE operation was handled as a WRITE operation
after the object instance was created. This becomes problematic when
handling of optional resources differs between these 2 operations.
Let's introduce an actual CREATE operation and use it later to create
these differences.
Signed-off-by: Michael Scott <michael.scott@linaro.org>
We are returning EINVAL from content format write ops when an object
field definition is not found (an optional field which is not
implemented). Instead, return ENOENT which lets the LwM2M engine
know to send ZOAP_RESPONSE_CODE_NOT_FOUND to the LwM2M server at the
end of handle_request().
NOTE: This behavior is not correct when we call the writer right after
a CREATE operation where the data is assigned to resources for the
first time. This case will be handled in a follow-up patch once we're
able to distinguish between a WRITE and a CREATE in the write op
handler.
Signed-off-by: Michael Scott <michael.scott@linaro.org>
POSIX requires struct sockaddr's field to be named "sa_family"
(not just "family"):
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009696699/basedefs/sys/socket.h.html
This change allows to port POSIX apps easier (including writing
portable apps using BSD Sockets compatible API).
Signed-off-by: Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org>
Per LwM2M specification 5.3.1 Register, report "ct=11543" when JSON is
supported. Also, report the resource type as rt="oma.lwm2m" when "ct="
presents.
Signed-off-by: Robert Chou <robert.ch.chou@acer.com>
Per LwM2M specification 5.3.1 Register. When object instances are
available, object ID can be ignored in registration message
Signed-off-by: Robert Chou <robert.ch.chou@acer.com>
According to LwM2M specification 5.2.7.3 Bootstrap DISOCVER,
security object is only reported to the bootstrap server.
Correct the behavior to (1) report server object to the server
(2) do not report security object at registration time
Signed-off-by: Robert Chou <robert.ch.chou@acer.com>
1. According to the specification 5.3.1, it's a MUST to specify
(1) content format: app link format (2) supported lwm2m version.
Also, we should use text/plain instead of LWM2M's (obsolete).
2. Use LWM2M_FORMAT_OMA_TLV as default accept format when accept option
is not given from the caller for TLV is a MUST have in LwM2M spec and
it can deals w/ multiple resources read
Signed-off-by: Robert Chou <robert.ch.chou@acer.com>
Save in observe_node_data so that later on we can select the correct
content format requested by the caller at the first time
Signed-off-by: Robert Chou <robert.ch.chou@acer.com>
Function do_write_op_tlv() uses in->inbuf and in->insize as a looping
condition to iterate through items in TLV payload and call
do_write_op_tlv_item() to update the value.
However, do_write_op_tlv_item() will override the value before calling
for fitting the usage of lwm2m_write_handler() function without restore
them. (lwm2m_write_handler() is also called by plain text/json writer
and is expecting in->inbuf is the start of buffer and in->insize as the
length of the buffer)
This will result in errors in do_write_op_tlv().
Signed-off-by: Robert Chou <robert.ch.chou@acer.com>
sprint_token is only used by SYS_LOG_DBG, so only build it when
CONFIG_SYS_LOG_LWM2M_LEVEL > 3.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo.salveti@linaro.org>
Separate response can happen when handling block transfer for firmware
updates, and to avoid duplicating the lwm2m_udp_receive function, create
and additional flag to allow handling CoAP separate response messages.
This is required to avoid removing the reply callback, since a new
message (with a valid token) will be received later from the server.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo.salveti@linaro.org>
Simplifly net_context_sendto calls and also allows to easily debug every
send/receive lwm2m call.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo.salveti@linaro.org>
IPSO Smart Objects are a set of template objects based on the LwM2M
object framework which are designed to represent standard hardware
such as temperature and humidity sensors or light controls.
Let's add a place for these objects to live as well as an initial
temperature sensor object.
Signed-off-by: Michael Scott <michael.scott@linaro.org>
Origin: SICS-IoT / Contiki OS
URL: https://github.com/sics-iot/lwm2m-contiki/tree/lwm2m-standalone-dtls
commit: d07b0bcd77ec7e8b93787669507f3d86cfbea64a
Purpose: Introduction of LwM2M client library.
Maintained-by: Zephyr
Lightweight Machine-to-Machine (LwM2M) is a protocol stack extension
of the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) which uses UDP
transmission packets.
This library was based on source worked on by Joakim Eriksson,
Niclas Finne and Joel Hoglund which was adopted by Contiki and then
later revamped to work as a stand-alone library.
A VERY high level summary of the changes made:
- [ALL] sources were re-formatted to Zephyr coding standards
- [engine] The engine portion was re-written due to the heavy reliance
on ER-CoAP APIs which are not compatible to the Zephyr CoAP APIs as
well as other Zephyr specific needs.
- [engine] All LWM2M/IPSO object data is now abstracted into resource
data which stores information like the data type, length, callbacks
to help with read/write. The engine modifies this data directly (or
makes callbacks) instead of all of the logic for this living in each
object's code. (This wasn't scaling well as I was implementing
changes).
- [engine] Related to the above change, I also added a generic set of
getter/setter functions that user applications can call to change
the object data instead of having to add getter/setting methods in
each object.
- [engine] The original sources shared the engine's context structure
quite extensively causing a problem with portability. I broke up the
context into it's individual parts: LWM2M path data, input data and
output data and pass only the needed data into each set of APIs.
- [content format read/writer] sources were re-organized into single
.c/h files per content formatter.
- [content format read/writer] sources were re-written where necessary
to remove the sharing of the lwm2m engine's context and instead only
requires the path and input or output data specific to it's
function.
- [LwM2M objects] re-written using the new engine's abstractions
Signed-off-by: Michael Scott <michael.scott@linaro.org>
Robert Chou