As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of
<zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the
Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a
catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to
include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or
subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc.
The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible
anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for
example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel,
drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header
would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that
an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level
headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though.
NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage
in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I
understand many people will have concerns.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
In order to bring consistency in-tree, migrate all samples to the use
the new prefix <zephyr/...>. Note that the conversion has been scripted:
```python
from pathlib import Path
import re
EXTENSIONS = ("c", "h", "cpp", "rst")
for p in Path(".").glob("samples/**/*"):
if not p.is_file() or p.suffix and p.suffix[1:] not in EXTENSIONS:
continue
content = ""
with open(p) as f:
for line in f:
m = re.match(r"^(.*)#include <(.*)>(.*)$", line)
if (m and
not m.group(2).startswith("zephyr/") and
(Path(".") / "include" / "zephyr" / m.group(2)).exists()):
content += (
m.group(1) +
"#include <zephyr/" + m.group(2) +">" +
m.group(3) + "\n"
)
else:
content += line
with open(p, "w") as f:
f.write(content)
```
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Gerard Marull-Paretas