Most bindings look something like this:
title: Foo
description: This binding provides a base representation of Foo
That kind of description doesn't add any useful information, as it's
just the title along with some copy-pasted text. I'm not sure what "base
representation" was supposed to mean originally either.
Many bindings also put something that's closer to a description in the
title, because it's not clear what's expected or how the title is used.
In reality, the title isn't used anywhere. 'description:' on the other
hand shows up as a comment in the generated header.
Deprecate 'title:' and generate a long informative warning if it shows
up in a binding.
Next commits will clean up the 'description:' strings (bringing them
closer to 'title:' in most cases) and remove 'title:' from all bindings.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <Ulf.Magnusson@nordicsemi.no>
Instead of
child:
bus: foo
parent:
bus: bar
, have
child-bus: foo
parent-bus: bar
'bus' is the only key that ever appears under 'child' and 'parent'.
Support the old keys for backwards compatibility, with a deprecation
warning if they're used.
Also add 'child/parent-bus' tests to the edtlib test suite. It was
untested before.
I also considered putting more stuff under 'child' and 'parent', but
there's not much point when there's just a few keys I think. Top-level
stuff is cleaner and easier to read.
I'm planning to add a 'child-binding' key a bit later (like 'sub-node',
but more flexible), and child-* is consistent with that.
Also add an unrelated test-bindings/grandchild-3.yaml that was
accidentally left out earlier.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <Ulf.Magnusson@nordicsemi.no>
Ulf Magnusson