Instead of implementing a custom power off API (pm_system_off),
implement the sys_poweroff hook, and indicate power off is supported by
selecting HAS_POWEROFF. Note that according to the PSCI specification
(DEN0022E), the SYSTEM_OFF operation does not return, however, an error
is printed and system is halted in case this occurs.
Note that the pm_system_off has also been deleted, from now on, systems
supporting PSCI should enable CONFIG_POWEROFF and call the standard
sys_poweroff() API.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard@teslabs.com>
Each PSCI interface versions have different DT compatible strings
like arm,psci-0.2, arm,psci-1.1 and so on. However, the same driver
can be used for all the versions by adding #define DT_COMPAT for
required version and #undef DT_COMPAT for default version.
Add support for PSCI cold reset, warm reset and cpu-on function IDs.
Signed-off-by: Girisha Dengi <girisha.dengi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Navinkumar Balabakthan <navinkumar.balabakthan@intel.com>
Following zephyr's style guideline, all if statements, including single
line statements shall have braces.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
In order to bring consistency in-tree, migrate all drivers to the new
prefix <zephyr/...>. Note that the conversion has been scripted, refer
to #45388 for more details.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Instead of putting object files inside libzephyr.a,
simply build a separate static library as most other
driver types are doing this already.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
Armv8-A and Armv8-R both support PSCI. So PM_CPU_OPS_PSCI's
dependency should be "ARM64" rather than "ARMV8-A".
Signed-off-by: Huifeng Zhang <Huifeng.Zhang@arm.com>
AArch64 has support for PSCI. This is especially useful for SMP because
PSCI is used to power on the secordary cores.
When the PSCI driver was introduced in Zephyr it was designed to rely on
a very PSCI-centric subsystem / interface.
There are two kinds of problems with this choice:
1. PSCI is only defined for the non-secure world and it is designed to
boot CPU cores into non-secure state (that means that PSCI is only
supposed to work if Zephyr is running in non-secure state)
2. There can be other ways or standards used to start / stop a core
different from PSCI
This patch is trying to fix the original wrong assumption by making the
interface / subsystem a generic one, called 'pm_cpu_ops', and using PSCI
only as an actual driver that is a user of this new interface /
subsystem.
For now the new subsystem is only exposing two methods: cpu_on and
cpu_off, others will probably follow according to the needs.
Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione <ccaione@baylibre.com>
Gerard Marull-Paretas