There were multiple spots where code was using the _wait_q_t
abstraction as a synonym for a dlist and doing direct list management
on them with the dlist APIs. Refactor _wait_q_t into a proper opaque
struct (not a typedef for sys_dlist_t) and write a simple wrapper API
for the existing usages. Now replacement of wait_q with a different
data structure is much cleaner.
Note that there were some SYS_DLIST_FOR_EACH_SAFE loops in mailbox.c
that got replaced by the normal/non-safe macro. While these loops do
mutate the list in the code body, they always do an early return in
those circumstances instead of returning into the macro'd for() loop,
so the _SAFE usage was needless.
Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
The POSIX layer had a simple ready_one_thread() utility. Move this to
the scheduler API (with a prepended underscore -- it's an internal
API) so that it can be synchronized along with the rest of the
scheduler.
Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
Now that other work has eliminated the two cases where we had to do a
reschedule "but yield even if we are cooperative", we can squash both
down to a single _reschedule() function which does almost exactly what
legacy _Swap() did, but wrapped as a proper scheduler API.
Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
Recent changes have eliminated most use of _Swap() in favor of higher
level scheduler abstractions. We can remove the header too.
Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
Everywhere the current thread is pended, the code is going to have to
do a _Swap() soon afterward, yet the scheduler API exposed these as
separate steps. Unify this pattern everywhere it appears, which saves
some code bytes and gets _Swap() out of the general scheduler API at
zero cost.
Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
There was a somewhat promiscuous pattern in the kernel where IPC
mechanisms would do something that might effect the current thread
choice, then check _must_switch_threads() (or occasionally
__must_switch_threads -- don't ask, the distinction is being replaced
by real English words), sometimes _is_in_isr() (but not always, even
in contexts where that looks like it would be a mistake), and then
call _Swap() if everything is OK, otherwise releasing the irq_lock().
Sometimes this was done directly, sometimes via the inverted test,
sometimes (poll, heh) by doing the test when the thread state was
modified and then needlessly passing the result up the call stack to
the point of the _Swap().
And some places were just calling _reschedule_threads(), which did all
this already.
Unify all this madness. The old _reschedule_threads() function has
split into two variants: _reschedule_yield() and
_reschedule_noyield(). The latter is the "normal" one that respects
the cooperative priority of the current thread (i.e. it won't switch
out even if there is a higher priority thread ready -- the current
thread has to pend itself first), the former is used in the handful of
places where code was doing a swap unconditionally, just to preserve
precise behavior across the refactor. I'm not at all convinced it
should exist...
Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
Move posix layer from 'kernel' to 'lib' folder as it is not
a core kernel feature.
Fixed posix header file dependencies as part of the move and
also removed NEWLIBC related macros from posix headers.
Signed-off-by: Ramakrishna Pallala <ramakrishna.pallala@intel.com>
Andy Ross