OrgZephyr/zephyr
OrgZephyr
/
zephyr
mirror of https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
zephyr/arch/riscv32/core/irq_offload.c

45 lines
826 B
C
Raw Normal View History

arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 07:24:30 +08:00
/*
* Copyright (c) 2016 Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
*
license: Replace Apache boilerplate with SPDX tag Replace the existing Apache 2.0 boilerplate header with an SPDX tag throughout the zephyr code tree. This patch was generated via a script run over the master branch. Also updated doc/porting/application.rst that had a dependency on line numbers in a literal include. Manually updated subsys/logging/sys_log.c that had a malformed header in the original file. Also cleanup several cases that already had a SPDX tag and we either got a duplicate or missed updating. Jira: ZEP-1457 Change-Id: I6131a1d4ee0e58f5b938300c2d2fc77d2e69572c Signed-off-by: David B. Kinder <david.b.kinder@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@linaro.org>
2017-01-19 09:01:01 +08:00
* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 07:24:30 +08:00
*/
#include <irq.h>
#include <irq_offload.h>
#include <misc/printk.h>
volatile irq_offload_routine_t _offload_routine;
static volatile void *offload_param;
/*
* Called by _enter_irq
*
* Just in case the offload routine itself generates an unhandled
* exception, clear the offload_routine global before executing.
*/
void _irq_do_offload(void)
{
irq_offload_routine_t tmp;
if (!_offload_routine)
return;
tmp = _offload_routine;
_offload_routine = NULL;
tmp((void *)offload_param);
}
void irq_offload(irq_offload_routine_t routine, void *parameter)
{
irq: Fix irq_lock api usage irq_lock returns an unsigned int, though, several places was using signed int. This commit fix this behaviour. In order to avoid this error happens again, a coccinelle script was added and can be used to check violations. Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin@intel.com>
2018-08-15 08:57:08 +08:00
unsigned int key;
arch: added support for the riscv32 architecture RISC-V is an open-source instruction set architecture. Added support for the 32bit version of RISC-V to Zephyr. 1) exceptions/interrupts/faults are handled at the architecture level via the __irq_wrapper handler. Context saving/restoring of registers can be handled at both architecture and SOC levels. If SOC-specific registers need to be saved, SOC level needs to provide __soc_save_context and __soc_restore_context functions that shall be accounted by the architecture level, when corresponding config variable RISCV_SOC_CONTEXT_SAVE is set. 2) As RISC-V architecture does not provide a clear ISA specification about interrupt handling, each RISC-V SOC handles it in its own way. Hence, at the architecture level, the __irq_wrapper handler expects the following functions to be provided by the SOC level: __soc_is_irq: to check if the exception is the result of an interrupt or not. __soc_handle_irq: handle pending IRQ at SOC level (ex: clear pending IRQ in SOC-specific IRQ register) 3) Thread/task scheduling, as well as IRQ offloading are handled via the RISC-V system call ("ecall"), which is also handled via the __irq_wrapper handler. The _Swap asm function just calls "ecall" to generate an exception. 4) As there is no conventional way of handling CPU power save in RISC-V, the default nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions just unlock interrupts and return to the caller, without issuing any CPU power saving instruction. Nonetheless, to allow SOC-level to implement proper CPU power save, nano_cpu_idle and nano_cpu_atomic_idle functions are defined as __weak at the architecture level. Change-Id: I980a161d0009f3f404ad22b226a6229fbb492389 Signed-off-by: Jean-Paul Etienne <fractalclone@gmail.com>
2017-01-11 07:24:30 +08:00
key = irq_lock();
_offload_routine = routine;
offload_param = parameter;
__asm__ volatile ("ecall");
irq_unlock(key);
}