zephyr/doc/getting_started/toolchain_other_x_compilers...

62 lines
2.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
Raw Normal View History

doc: overhaul getting_started The getting started documentation has become a bit of a mess over time: - The reader needs to jump forward and backward in the documents depending on what their system already has installed (e.g. "start by cloning Zephyr, oh wait, see below if you don't have Git yet" etc.). - The operating system setup guides, toolchain setup instructions, and application build and run information have each become their own balkanized fiefdom, with duplicated, confusing and sometimes inconsistent results. - Linux documentation for all distributions is incomplete in some places (the Arch documentation in particular is vestigial) and wrong in others (platforms like Ubuntu still nominally require tools, like autoconf, that haven't been necessary since we stopped using the C Kconfig tools) - The dependencies needed to build the documentation have gotten *huge* since the LaTeX additions and massively overstate the footprint of Zephyr's real dependencies. This is particularly a problem on Linux, where those dependencies were not clearly separated from those needed to build Zephyr. - The toolchain setup documentation is confusing and scattered across the main file and the platform-specific files. There are various bits of incomplete and/or incorrect information. For example, the docs imply that you can use the Zephyr SDK on non-Linux hosts, which isn't true. As another example, some toolchains, such as GNU Arm Embedded, are documented several times. As a final example, some toolchains, such as Intel's ISSM, are squirrelled away in the Windows document when there are Linux builds available. Overhaul the pages to fix these issues and otherwise clean up the language. One significant side-effect is that all the toolchain-related information is rooted in a single toctree. Another is that it should now be possible to follow the instructions, in order, on any supported platform. Signed-off-by: Marti Bolivar <marti@foundries.io>
2018-10-15 13:20:24 +08:00
.. _other_x_compilers:
Other Cross Compilers
######################
This toolchain variant is borrowed from the Linux kernel build system's
mechanism of using a :envvar:`CROSS_COMPILE` environment variable to set up a
GNU-based cross toolchain.
Examples of such "other cross compilers" are cross toolchains that your Linux
distribution packaged, that you compiled on your own, or that you downloaded
from the net. Unlike toolchains specifically listed in
:ref:`third_party_x_compilers`, the Zephyr build system may not have been
tested with them, and doesn't officially support them. (Nonetheless, the
toolchain set-up mechanism itself is supported.)
Follow these steps to use one of these toolchains.
#. Install a cross compiler suitable for your host and target systems.
For example, you might install the ``gcc-arm-none-eabi`` package on
Debian-based Linux systems, or ``arm-none-eabi-newlib`` on Fedora or Red
Hat:
.. code-block:: console
# On Debian or Ubuntu
sudo apt-get install gcc-arm-none-eabi
# On Fedora or Red Hat
sudo dnf install arm-none-eabi-newlib
#. :ref:`Set these environment variables <env_vars>`:
doc: overhaul getting_started The getting started documentation has become a bit of a mess over time: - The reader needs to jump forward and backward in the documents depending on what their system already has installed (e.g. "start by cloning Zephyr, oh wait, see below if you don't have Git yet" etc.). - The operating system setup guides, toolchain setup instructions, and application build and run information have each become their own balkanized fiefdom, with duplicated, confusing and sometimes inconsistent results. - Linux documentation for all distributions is incomplete in some places (the Arch documentation in particular is vestigial) and wrong in others (platforms like Ubuntu still nominally require tools, like autoconf, that haven't been necessary since we stopped using the C Kconfig tools) - The dependencies needed to build the documentation have gotten *huge* since the LaTeX additions and massively overstate the footprint of Zephyr's real dependencies. This is particularly a problem on Linux, where those dependencies were not clearly separated from those needed to build Zephyr. - The toolchain setup documentation is confusing and scattered across the main file and the platform-specific files. There are various bits of incomplete and/or incorrect information. For example, the docs imply that you can use the Zephyr SDK on non-Linux hosts, which isn't true. As another example, some toolchains, such as GNU Arm Embedded, are documented several times. As a final example, some toolchains, such as Intel's ISSM, are squirrelled away in the Windows document when there are Linux builds available. Overhaul the pages to fix these issues and otherwise clean up the language. One significant side-effect is that all the toolchain-related information is rooted in a single toctree. Another is that it should now be possible to follow the instructions, in order, on any supported platform. Signed-off-by: Marti Bolivar <marti@foundries.io>
2018-10-15 13:20:24 +08:00
- Set :envvar:`ZEPHYR_TOOLCHAIN_VARIANT` to ``cross-compile``.
- Set :envvar:`CROSS_COMPILE` to the common path prefix which your
toolchain's binaries have, e.g. the path to the directory containing the
compiler binaries plus the target triplet and trailing dash.
#. To check that you have set these variables correctly in your current
environment, follow these example shell sessions (the
:envvar:`CROSS_COMPILE` value may be different on your system):
doc: overhaul getting_started The getting started documentation has become a bit of a mess over time: - The reader needs to jump forward and backward in the documents depending on what their system already has installed (e.g. "start by cloning Zephyr, oh wait, see below if you don't have Git yet" etc.). - The operating system setup guides, toolchain setup instructions, and application build and run information have each become their own balkanized fiefdom, with duplicated, confusing and sometimes inconsistent results. - Linux documentation for all distributions is incomplete in some places (the Arch documentation in particular is vestigial) and wrong in others (platforms like Ubuntu still nominally require tools, like autoconf, that haven't been necessary since we stopped using the C Kconfig tools) - The dependencies needed to build the documentation have gotten *huge* since the LaTeX additions and massively overstate the footprint of Zephyr's real dependencies. This is particularly a problem on Linux, where those dependencies were not clearly separated from those needed to build Zephyr. - The toolchain setup documentation is confusing and scattered across the main file and the platform-specific files. There are various bits of incomplete and/or incorrect information. For example, the docs imply that you can use the Zephyr SDK on non-Linux hosts, which isn't true. As another example, some toolchains, such as GNU Arm Embedded, are documented several times. As a final example, some toolchains, such as Intel's ISSM, are squirrelled away in the Windows document when there are Linux builds available. Overhaul the pages to fix these issues and otherwise clean up the language. One significant side-effect is that all the toolchain-related information is rooted in a single toctree. Another is that it should now be possible to follow the instructions, in order, on any supported platform. Signed-off-by: Marti Bolivar <marti@foundries.io>
2018-10-15 13:20:24 +08:00
.. code-block:: console
# Linux, macOS:
$ echo $ZEPHYR_TOOLCHAIN_VARIANT
cross-compile
$ echo $CROSS_COMPILE
/usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-
doc: overhaul getting_started The getting started documentation has become a bit of a mess over time: - The reader needs to jump forward and backward in the documents depending on what their system already has installed (e.g. "start by cloning Zephyr, oh wait, see below if you don't have Git yet" etc.). - The operating system setup guides, toolchain setup instructions, and application build and run information have each become their own balkanized fiefdom, with duplicated, confusing and sometimes inconsistent results. - Linux documentation for all distributions is incomplete in some places (the Arch documentation in particular is vestigial) and wrong in others (platforms like Ubuntu still nominally require tools, like autoconf, that haven't been necessary since we stopped using the C Kconfig tools) - The dependencies needed to build the documentation have gotten *huge* since the LaTeX additions and massively overstate the footprint of Zephyr's real dependencies. This is particularly a problem on Linux, where those dependencies were not clearly separated from those needed to build Zephyr. - The toolchain setup documentation is confusing and scattered across the main file and the platform-specific files. There are various bits of incomplete and/or incorrect information. For example, the docs imply that you can use the Zephyr SDK on non-Linux hosts, which isn't true. As another example, some toolchains, such as GNU Arm Embedded, are documented several times. As a final example, some toolchains, such as Intel's ISSM, are squirrelled away in the Windows document when there are Linux builds available. Overhaul the pages to fix these issues and otherwise clean up the language. One significant side-effect is that all the toolchain-related information is rooted in a single toctree. Another is that it should now be possible to follow the instructions, in order, on any supported platform. Signed-off-by: Marti Bolivar <marti@foundries.io>
2018-10-15 13:20:24 +08:00
You can also set ``CROSS_COMPILE`` as a CMake variable.
doc: overhaul getting_started The getting started documentation has become a bit of a mess over time: - The reader needs to jump forward and backward in the documents depending on what their system already has installed (e.g. "start by cloning Zephyr, oh wait, see below if you don't have Git yet" etc.). - The operating system setup guides, toolchain setup instructions, and application build and run information have each become their own balkanized fiefdom, with duplicated, confusing and sometimes inconsistent results. - Linux documentation for all distributions is incomplete in some places (the Arch documentation in particular is vestigial) and wrong in others (platforms like Ubuntu still nominally require tools, like autoconf, that haven't been necessary since we stopped using the C Kconfig tools) - The dependencies needed to build the documentation have gotten *huge* since the LaTeX additions and massively overstate the footprint of Zephyr's real dependencies. This is particularly a problem on Linux, where those dependencies were not clearly separated from those needed to build Zephyr. - The toolchain setup documentation is confusing and scattered across the main file and the platform-specific files. There are various bits of incomplete and/or incorrect information. For example, the docs imply that you can use the Zephyr SDK on non-Linux hosts, which isn't true. As another example, some toolchains, such as GNU Arm Embedded, are documented several times. As a final example, some toolchains, such as Intel's ISSM, are squirrelled away in the Windows document when there are Linux builds available. Overhaul the pages to fix these issues and otherwise clean up the language. One significant side-effect is that all the toolchain-related information is rooted in a single toctree. Another is that it should now be possible to follow the instructions, in order, on any supported platform. Signed-off-by: Marti Bolivar <marti@foundries.io>
2018-10-15 13:20:24 +08:00
When using this option, all of your toolchain binaries must reside in the same
directory and have a common file name prefix. The ``CROSS_COMPILE`` variable
is set to the directory concatenated with the file name prefix. In the Debian
example above, the ``gcc-arm-none-eabi`` package installs binaries such as
``arm-none-eabi-gcc`` and ``arm-none-eabi-ld`` in directory ``/usr/bin/``, so
the common prefix is ``/usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-`` (including the trailing dash,
``-``). If your toolchain is installed in ``/opt/mytoolchain/bin`` with binary
names based on target triplet ``myarch-none-elf``, ``CROSS_COMPILE`` would be
set to ``/opt/mytoolchain/bin/myarch-none-elf-``.