zephyr/boards/x86/arduino_101/arduino_101.yaml

identifier: arduino_101
name: Arduino 101
type: mcu
arch: x86
toolchain:
  - zephyr
  - issm
  - xtools
supported:
  - usb_device
  - ble
  - aio
  - spi
  - i2c
  - dma
  - gpio
  - pwm
ram: 52
flash: 144
boards: add board meta-data Add board metadata to be consumed by the sanitycheck script to provide better matching with testcases and to test based on features declated in the board files. Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com> 2017-04-05 11:08:59 +08:00			`identifier: arduino_101`
			`name: Arduino 101`
			`type: mcu`
			`arch: x86`
			`toolchain:`
			`- zephyr`
			`- issm`
boards: more boards with xtools support Add first set of boards which can be built with xtools, this will include all boards at some point, so we might need a better way to whitelist toolchains that does not include changing every single board definition file. For now enabling those needed for testing the new toolchain. Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com> 2018-07-04 10:17:23 +08:00			`- xtools`
boards: introduce usb_device support tag Introduce a new tag for boards that have usb_device support. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@linaro.org> 2017-07-07 21:22:44 +08:00			`supported:`
			`- usb_device`
samples: mesh: build only on BLE platforms Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com> 2017-07-25 19:08:56 +08:00			`- ble`
boards: add supported features Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com> 2017-10-04 22:51:53 +08:00			`- aio`
			`- spi`
			`- i2c`
tests: dma: use depends_on to whitelist platforms Only build for those platforms that support DMA. Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com> 2017-12-08 22:50:34 +08:00			`- dma`
boards: add supported features Update board definitions with supported feature. This is temporary until we have full coverage for device drivers in DTS, then we can use DTS instead. Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com> 2017-12-08 23:24:28 +08:00			`- gpio`
			`- pwm`
boards: Add "ram" and "flash" properties for a number of boards Currently, it seems that only boards with smaller amount of RAM get a value for "ram" property, and very few boards have "flash" defined. However, to test bigger sample applications, it's helpful to have these properties universally defined. Signed-off-by: Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org> 2018-03-14 05:40:40 +08:00			`ram: 52`
			`flash: 144`