FatFs Module Application Note

How to Port

Basic considerations

The FatFs module is assuming following conditions on portability.

• ANSI C
  The FatFs module is a middleware written in ANSI C (C89). There is no platform dependence, so long as the compiler is in compliance with ANSI C.
• Size of integer types
  The FatFs module assumes that size of char/short/long are 8/16/32 bit and int is 16 or 32 bit. These correspondence are defined in integer.h. This will not be a problem on most compilers. When any conflict with existing definitions is occured, you must resolve it with care.

System organizations

The dependency diagram shown below is a typical configuration of the embedded system with FatFs module.

(a) If a working disk module with FatFs API is provided, no additional function is needed. (b) To attach existing disk drivers with different API, glue functions are needed to translate the APIs between FatFs and the drivers.

Which function is required?

You need to provide only low level disk I/O functions that required by FatFs module and nothing else. If a working disk module for the target system is already existing, you need to write only glue functions to attach it to the FatFs module. If not, you need to port any other disk module or write it from scratch. Most of defined functions are not that always required. For example, disk write function is not required at read-only configuration. Following table shows which function is required depends onthe configuration options.

Limits

• FAT sub-types: FAT12, FAT16 and FAT32.
• Number of open files: Unlimited. (depends on available memory)
• Number of volumes: Upto 10.
• File size: Upto 4G-1 bytes. (by FAT specs.)
• Volume size: Upto 2T bytes at 512 bytes/sector. (by FAT specs.)
• Cluster size: Upto 64K bytes at 512 bytes/sector. (by FAT specs.)
• Sector size: 512, 1024, 2048 and 4096 bytes. (by FAT specs.)

Memory Usage

The memory usege varies depends on the configuration options.

These are the memory usage on some target systems with following condition. The memory sizes are in unit of byte, V denotes number of volumes and F denotes number of open files. All samples are optimezed in code size.

FatFs R0.11 options:
_FS_READONLY   0 (R/W) or 1 (R/O)
_FS_MINIMIZE   0 (Full basic function) or 3 (Minimized function)
_VOLUMES       V (Number of logical drives to be used)
_WORD_ACCESS   0 or 1 (Set for 1 if possible)
(Any other options are left not changed from default setting)

Module Size Reduction

Follwing table shows which API function is removed by configuration options for the module size reduction. To use any API function, the row of the function must be clear.

Long File Name

FatFs module supports LFN (long file name). The two different file names, SFN (short file name) and LFN, of a file is transparent on the API except for f_readdir function. The LFN feature is disabled by default. To enable it, set _USE_LFN to 1, 2 or 3, and add option/unicode.c to the project. The LFN feature requiers a certain working buffer in addition. The buffer size can be configured by _MAX_LFN according to the available memory. The length of an LFN will reach up to 255 characters, so that the _MAX_LFN should be set to 255 for full featured LFN operation. If the size of working buffer is insufficient for the input file name, the file function fails with FR_INVALID_NAME. When enable the LFN feature under re-entrant configuration, _USE_LFN must be set to 2 or 3. In this case, the file function allocates the working buffer on the stack or heap. The working buffer occupies (_MAX_LFN + 1) * 2 bytes.

When the LFN feature is enabled, the module size will be increased depends on the configured code page. Right table shows how much code size increased when LFN feature is enabled with some code pages. Especially, in the CJK region, tens of thousands of characters are being used. Unfortunately, it requires a huge OEM-Unicode bidirectional conversion table and the module size will be drastically increased as shown in the table. As the result, the FatFs with LFN feature with those code pages will not able to be implemented to most 8-bit microcontrollers.

Note that the LFN feature on the FAT file system is a patent of Microsoft Corporation. This is not the case on FAT32 but most FAT32 drivers come with the LFN feature. FatFs can swich the LFN feature on/off by configuration option. When enable LFN feature on the commercial products, a license from Microsoft may be required depends on the final destination.

Unicode API

By default, FatFs uses ANSI/OEM code set on the API even at LFN configuration. FatFs can also switch the character encoding on the API to Unicode by _LFN_UNICODE option. This means that the FatFs supports the True-LFN feature. For more information, refer to the description in the file name.

Re-entrancy

The file operations to the different volume is always re-entrant regardless of configurations and it can work simultaneously.

The file operations to the same volume is not re-entrant but it can also be configured to thread-safe by _FS_REENTRANT option. In this case, also the OS dependent synchronization object control functions, ff_cre_syncobj/ff_del_syncobj/ff_req_grant/ff_rel_grant, must be added to the project. There are some examples in the option/syscall.c.

When a file function is called while the volume is in use by any other task, the file function is suspended until that task leaves the file function. If the wait time exceeded a period defined by _TIMEOUT, the file function will abort with FR_TIMEOUT. The timeout feature might not be supported on some RTOS.

There is an exception for f_mount/f_mkfs/f_fdisk function. These volume control functions are not re-entrant to the same volume and corresponding physical drive. When use these functions, all other tasks must unmount the volume and avoid to access the volume.

Note that this section describes on the re-entrancy of the FatFs module itself but also the low level disk I/O layer must be thread-safe when any FatFs API is re-entered.

Duplicated File Access

FatFs module does not support the read/write collision control of duplicated open to a file. The duplicated open is permitted only when each of open method to a file is read mode. The duplicated open with one or more write mode to a file is always prohibited, and also open file must not be renamed or deleted. A violation of these rules can cause data colluption.

The file lock control can be enabled by _FS_LOCK option. The value of option defines the number of open objects to manage simultaneously. In this case, if any open, rename or remove that violating the file shareing rule that described above is attempted, the file function will fail with FR_LOCKED. If number of open objects, files and sub-directories, is equal to _FS_LOCK, an extra f_open/f_optndir/f_findfirst function will fail with FR_TOO_MANY_OPEN_FILES.

Performance Effective File Access

For good read/write throughput on the small embedded systems with limited size of memory, application programmer should consider what process is done in the FatFs module. The file data on the volume is transferred in following sequence by f_read function.

Figure 1. Sector misaligned read (short)

Figure 2. Sector misaligned read (long)

Figure 3. Fully sector aligned read

The file I/O buffer is a sector buffer to read/write a partial data on the sector. The sector buffer is either file private sector buffer on each file object or shared sector buffer in the file system object. The buffer configuration option _FS_TINY determins which sector buffer is used for the file data transfer. When tiny buffer configuration (1) is selected, data memory consumption is reduced _MAX_SS bytes each file object. In this case, FatFs module uses only a sector buffer in the file system object for file data transfer and FAT/directory access. The disadvantage of the tiny buffer configuration is: the FAT data cached in the sector buffer will be lost by file data transfer and it must be reloaded at every cluster boundary. However it will be suitable for most application from view point of the decent performance and low memory comsumption.

Figure 1 shows that a partial sector, sector misaligned part of the file, is transferred via the file I/O buffer. At long data transfer shown in Figure 2, middle of transfer data that covers one or more sector is transferred to the application buffer directly. Figure 3 shows that the case of entier transfer data is aligned to the sector boundary. In this case, file I/O buffer is not used. On the direct transfer, the maximum extent of sectors are read with disk_read function at a time but the multiple sector transfer is divided at cluster boundary even if it is contiguous.

Therefore taking effort to sector aligned read/write accesss eliminates buffered data transfer and the read/write performance will be improved. Besides the effect, cached FAT data will not be flushed by file data transfer at the tiny configuration, so that it can achieve same performance as non-tiny configuration with small memory footprint.

Considerations on Flash Memory Media

To maximize the write performance of flash memory media, such as SDC, CFC and U Disk, it must be controlled in consideration of its characteristitcs.

Using Mutiple-Sector Write

Figure 6. Comparison between Multiple/Single Sector Write

The write throughput of the flash memory media becomes the worst at single sector write transaction. The write throughput increases as the number of sectors per a write transaction as shown in Figure 6. This effect more appers at faster interface speed and the performance ratio often becomes grater than ten. This graph is clearly explaining how fast is multiple block write (W:16K, 32 sectors) than single block write (W:100, 1 sector), and also larger card tends to be slow at single block write. Number of write transactions also affects life time of the flash memory media. When compared at same amount of write data, the single sector write in Figure 6 above wears flash memory media 16 times more than multiple sector write in Figure 6 below. Single sector write is pretty pain for the flash memory media.

Therefore the application program should write the data in large block as possible. The ideal write chunk size and alighment is size of sector, and size of cluster is the best. Of course all layers between the application and the storage device must have consideration on multiple sector write, however most of open-source memory card drivers lack it. Do not split a multiple sector write request into single sector write transactions or the write throughput gets poor. Note that FatFs module and its sample disk drivers supprt multiple sector read/write feature.

Forcing Memory Erase

When remove a file with f_remove function, the data clusters occupied by the file are marked 'free' on the FAT. But the data sectors containing the file data are not that applied any process, so that the file data left occupies a part of the flash memory array as 'live block'. If the file data is forced erased on removing the file, those data blocks will be turned in to the free block pool. This may skip internal block erase operation to the data block on next write operation. As the result the write performance might be improved. FatFs can manage this feature by setting _USE_TRIM to 1. Note that this is an expectation of internal process of the flash memory storage and not that always effective. Also f_remove function will take a time when remove a large file. Most applications will not need this feature.

Critical Section

If a write operation to the FAT volume is interrupted due to any accidental failure, such as sudden blackout, incorrect media removal and unrecoverable disk error, the FAT structure on the volume can be broken. Following images shows the critical section of the FatFs module.

Figure 4. Long critical section

Figure 5. Minimized critical section

An interruption in the red section can cause a cross link; as a result, the object being changed can be lost. If an interruption in the yellow section is occured, there is one or more possibility listed below.

• The file data being rewrited is collapsed.
• The file being appended returns initial state.
• The file created as new is gone.
• The file created as new or overwritten remains but no content.
• Efficiency of disk use gets worse due to lost clusters.

Each case does not affect the files that not opened in write mode. To minimize risk of data loss, the critical section can be minimized by minimizing the time that file is opened in write mode or using f_sync function as shown in Figure 5.

Extended Use of FatFs API

These are examples of extended use of FatFs APIs. New item will be added whenever a useful code is found.

1. Open or create a file for append
2. Empty a directory
3. Allocate contiguous area to the file
4. Function/Compatible checker for low level disk I/O module
5. FAT image creator

About FatFs License

FatFs has being developped as a personal project of author, ChaN. It is free from the code anyone else wrote. Following code block shows a copy of the FatFs license document that included in the source files.

/*----------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/  FatFs - FAT file system module  R0.11                 (C)ChaN, 2015
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/ FatFs module is a free software that opened under license policy of
/ following conditions.
/
/ Copyright (C) 2015, ChaN, all right reserved.
/
/ 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
/    this condition and the following disclaimer.
/
/ This software is provided by the copyright holder and contributors "AS IS"
/ and any warranties related to this software are DISCLAIMED.
/ The copyright owner or contributors be NOT LIABLE for any damages caused
/ by use of this software.
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/

Therefore FatFs license is one of the BSD-style licenses but there is a significant feature. FatFs is mainly intended for embedded systems. In order to extend the usability for commercial products, the redistributions of FatFs in binary form, such as embedded code or any forms without source code, does not need to explain about use of FatFs in the documentations. This is equivalent to the 1-clause BSD license. Of course FatFs is compatible with the most open source software licenses including GNU GPL. When you redistribute the FatFs source code with any modification or create a fork, the license can also be changed to GNU GPL, BSD-style license or any open source software licenses that not conflict with FatFs license.