Gregory Nutt 6893843cc5 sched/semaphore: Fix a warning aout an unused variable when priority inheritance is enabled.		2017-03-21 13:47:56 -06:00
..
Make.defs	sem_setprotocol: Handle a case of missing proxy for sem_setprotocol. Reorder so that (1) this error is avoided, and (2) >No proxy is needed if priority inheritance is not enabled.	2016-11-03 18:51:38 -06:00
sem_destroy.c	…
sem_holder.c	sched/semaphore: Fix a warning aout an unused variable when priority inheritance is enabled.	2017-03-21 13:47:56 -06:00
sem_initialize.c	…
sem_post.c	Add some comments.	2016-11-05 09:44:29 -06:00
sem_recover.c	…
sem_reset.c	…
sem_setprotocol.c	Missing # on endif	2016-11-03 21:27:52 -06:00
sem_tickwait.c	…
sem_timedwait.c	Move cancellation point definitions to their own header file.	2016-12-10 09:08:26 -06:00
sem_timeout.c	…
sem_trywait.c	sem_wait() and sem_trywait() no longer modify the errno value UNLESS an error occurs. This allows these functions to be used internallly without clobbering the errno value.	2016-11-09 07:01:49 -06:00
sem_wait.c	Cancellation points: Fix some backward logic in conditional compilation.	2017-02-02 06:42:41 -06:00
sem_waitirq.c	…
semaphore.h	Within the OS, when a thread obtains a semaphore count it must call sem_addholder() if CONFIG_PRIORITY_INHERITANCE is enabled. If a count is available, then sem_wait() calls sem_addholder(), otherwise it waited for the semaphore and called sem_addholder() when it eventually received the count.	2016-10-26 07:23:15 -06:00
spinlock.c	SMP: There were certain conditions that we must avoid by preventing releasing the pending tasks while withn a critical section. But this logic was incomplete; there was no logic to prevent other CPUs from adding new, running tasks while on CPU is in a critical section.	2016-12-27 08:49:07 -06:00