1. add IS_ALIGNED() definitions for NuttX;
2. replace all the ALIGN_UP() and ALIGN_DOWN() to use common
align implementation;
Signed-off-by: Bowen Wang <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
Use bit mask method to represent the command, because it's more
convenient to express multiple characteristics simultaneously.
Signed-off-by: Yongrong Wang <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
Usually rpmsg ping logs are needed during testing,
but too many other module logs can easily overwrite it,
so improve the rpmsg ping log level, later we can setlogmask to
a higher log level to mask other modules' logs.
Signed-off-by: Yongrong Wang <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
use reserved[2] in struct resource_table as the command, avoid the
resource table format do not follow the standard.
Signed-off-by: Yongrong Wang <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
Add more common command for rptun and rpmsg_virtio frameworks,
also modify the rptun and rpmsg_virtio driver to use the common
commands.
Signed-off-by: Yongrong Wang <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
Move the panic logic in common places, later we can move more logic to
the framework instead of having the drivers implement it repeatedly.
Signed-off-by: Yongrong Wang <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: Bowen Wang <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
rpmsg_port_spi_connect can not be used here because peer may have not finished
the last transmission which will keep the sreq gpio in high level, and it will
read an error data frame.
Signed-off-by: liaoao <liaoao@xiaomi.com>
Because the data transmision may has been started before
rpmsg_port_initialize(), this should be not allowed.
Signed-off-by: liaoao <liaoao@xiaomi.com>
Rpmsg Port Uart is a new rpmsg transport layer.
Just like the rpmsg port spi, the difference is that the physical
communication method changed from SPI to UART.
Signed-off-by: Bowen Wang <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
Add get_local_cpuname to the rpmsg framework ops to support communicate
with the same remote core with multi rpmsg transport.
Some rpmsg services will send local cpu name to remote core and then let
remote core to connect local core by using this cpu name, when there are
multi rpmsg channels with same remote core, the remote core may connect
to incorrect core, so use the error rpmsg channel.
For example, there are two rpmsg channels between ap and audio:
ap core audio core
[ap1] <-- rpmsg virtio1 --> [audio1]
[ap2] <-- rpmsg virtio2 --> [audio2]
When we want to use the rpmsg virtio1 to communicate, ap core may send
local cpuname "ap2" to audio, so the audio core use remote cpu "ap2" to
connect with ap, and resulting in the use of incorrect rpmsg channel.
Signed-off-by: Bowen Wang <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
Rpmsg Router is new rpmsg transport layer, it can router the rpmsg
messages to a cpu that not directly connected with local cpu by Rpmsg,
For the rpmsg services, it is as if there is a real Rpmsg Channel between
the local cpu and the remote cpu.
For examples, there are three cpus: ap, cp and audio.
ap and cp, ap and audio has share memory and be connected by Rpmsg VirtIO,
so ap and cp, ap and audio can communicate with each other by Rpmsg, but
cp can not communicate with audio direclty.
[cp] <-- rpmsg virtio --> [ap] <-- rpmsg virtio --> [audio]
With rpmsg router, the cp can communicate with audip by Rpmsg dereclty because
the router in ap will forward the rpmsg message from cp/audio to audio/cp, like
this:
+<----- rpmsg router --> hub <-- rpmsg router ------>+
| | |
[cp] <-- rpmsg virtio --> [ap] <-- rpmsg virtio --> [audio]
Signed-off-by: yintao <yintao@xiaomi.com>
Add Rpmsg-Port-SPI transport layer.
Rpmsg Port SPI is a new rpmsg transport layer based on the Rpmsg Port,
it provides the capability for two SPI-connected (and two extra GPIO)
chips to communicate with each other using Rpmsg.
All already implemented Rpmsg Services can be used with this new transport
layer without any modifications.
Signed-off-by: liaoao <liaoao@xiaomi.com>
Rpmsg Physical Transport Layer is a new rpmsg transport, it's a
common part for the physical communication based rpmsg transport
layers such as Rpmsg-SPI and Rpmsg-Uart.
It implements three common parts:
1. Implement the NuttX and OpenAMP rpmsg frameworks' ops and the
rpmsg name service;
2. The buffer management and provide some APIs to lower layer to use;
Signed-off-by: liaoao <liaoao@xiaomi.com>
rpmsg_virtio_ivshmem polling mode use wdog to loop instead work
queue, beacause wdog has better performance
Signed-off-by: wangyongrong <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
Change the rpmsg_virtio_ivshmem from pci bus based to
pci-ivshmem bus based, so rpmsg_virtio_ivshmem can support interrupt
mode and also support the multi instance.
Signed-off-by: wangyongrong <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: Bowen Wang <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
rpmsg_virtio_ivshmem is a ivshmem based rpmsg virtio driver,
with this driver, we can use the rpmsg virtio in qemu platfrom
Signed-off-by: Yongrong Wang <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: Bowen Wang <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
Rpmsg VirtIO is a virtio transport implementation for Rpmsg, and
it's different to the rptun framework.
rpmsg_virtio.c implements the rpmsg virtio transport layer by itself
to avoid use the remoteproc implementation in OpenAMP to save code
size, so it can be treated as a lightweight version of rptun.
Therefore, rpmsg_virtio.c only support the communication feature and
do not support contoll the life cycle of the remote core.
But benefit by it's small footprint, it can be used in the chips with
small flash.
Signed-off-by: Yongrong Wang <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: Bowen Wang <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
Bowen Wang