NuttxPortingGuide.html edited online with Bitbucket
This commit is contained in:
parent
3ec02adee0
commit
7244ae9a98
|
@ -422,7 +422,7 @@
|
|||
</li>
|
||||
<li>
|
||||
<i>Chip/SoC specific files</i>.
|
||||
Each processor processor architecture is embedded in chip or <i>System-on-a-Chip</i> (SoC) architecture.
|
||||
Each processor architecture is embedded in chip or <i>System-on-a-Chip</i> (SoC) architecture.
|
||||
The full chip architecture includes the processor architecture plus chip-specific interrupt logic,
|
||||
clocking logic, general purpose I/O (GPIO) logic, and specialized, internal peripherals (such as UARTs, USB, etc.).
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
|
@ -1531,7 +1531,7 @@ The specific environmental definitions are unique for each board but should incl
|
|||
The definitions in that header file provide the common interface between NuttX and the architecture-specific implementation in <code>arch/</code>.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<blockquote><small>
|
||||
<code>up_</code> is supposed to stand for microprocessor; the <code>u</code> is like the Greek letter micron: <i>µ</i>. So it would be <code>µP</code> which is a common shortening of the word microprocessor. I don't like that name very much. I wish I would have used a more obvious prefix like <code>arch_</code> instead -- then I would not have to answer this question so often.
|
||||
<code>up_</code> is supposed to stand for microprocessor; the <code>u</code> is like the Greek letter micron: <i><EFBFBD></i>. So it would be <code><EFBFBD>P</code> which is a common shortening of the word microprocessor. I don't like that name very much. I wish I would have used a more obvious prefix like <code>arch_</code> instead -- then I would not have to answer this question so often.
|
||||
</small></blockquote>
|
||||
</li>
|
||||
<li>
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue