101 lines
5.1 KiB
ReStructuredText
101 lines
5.1 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
==================================
|
||
|
Naming and Header File Conventions
|
||
|
==================================
|
||
|
|
||
|
- **Common Microprocessor Interfaces**. Any interface that is
|
||
|
common to all microprocessors should be prefixed with ``up_``
|
||
|
and prototyped in ``include/nuttx/arch.h``. The definitions in
|
||
|
that header file provide the common interface between NuttX and
|
||
|
the architecture-specific implementation in ``arch/``.
|
||
|
|
||
|
``up_`` is supposed to stand for microprocessor; the ``u``
|
||
|
is like the Greek letter micron: ľ. So it would be ``ľP``
|
||
|
which is a common shortening of the word microprocessor. I
|
||
|
don't like that name very much. I wish I would have used a
|
||
|
more obvious prefix like ``arch_`` instead -- then I would
|
||
|
not have to answer this question so often.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- **Microprocessor-Specific Interfaces**. An interface which is
|
||
|
unique to a certain microprocessor should be prefixed with the
|
||
|
name of the microprocessor, for example ``stm32_``, and be
|
||
|
prototyped in some header file in the ``arch/`` directories.
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is also a ``arch/<architecture>/include/<chip>/chip.h``
|
||
|
header file that can be used to communicate other
|
||
|
microprocessor-specific information between the board logic and
|
||
|
even application logic. Application logic may, for example,
|
||
|
need to know specific capabilities of the chip. Prototypes in
|
||
|
that ``chip.h`` header file should follow the
|
||
|
microprocessor-specific naming convention.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- **Common Board Interfaces**. Any interface that is common to
|
||
|
all boards should be prefixed with ``board_`` and should also
|
||
|
be prototyped in ``include/nuttx/board.h``. These ``board_``
|
||
|
definitions provide the interface between the board-level logic
|
||
|
and the commaon and architecture-specific logic.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- **Board-Specific Interfaces**. Any interface which is unique to
|
||
|
a board should be prefixed with the board name, for example
|
||
|
``stm32f4discovery_``. Sometimes the board name is too long so
|
||
|
``stm32_`` would be okay too. These should be prototyped in
|
||
|
``boards/<arch>/<chip>/<board>/src/<board>.h`` and should not
|
||
|
be used outside of that directory since board-specific
|
||
|
definitions have no meaning outside of the board directory.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- **Scope of Inclusions**. Header files are made accessible to
|
||
|
internal OS logic and to applications through symbolic links
|
||
|
and through *include paths* that are provided to the C/C++
|
||
|
compiler. Through these include paths, the NuttX build system
|
||
|
also enforces modularity in the design. For example, one
|
||
|
important design principle is architectural *layering*. In this
|
||
|
case I am referring to the OS as layered into application
|
||
|
interface, common internal OS logic, and lower level
|
||
|
platform-specific layers. The platform-specific layers all
|
||
|
reside in the either ``arch/`` sub-directories on the
|
||
|
``config/`` subdirectories: The former sub-directories are
|
||
|
reserved for microcontroller-specific logic and the latter for
|
||
|
board-specific logic.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In the strict, layered NuttX architecture, the upper level OS
|
||
|
services are always available to platform-specific logic.
|
||
|
However, the opposite is *not* true: Common OS logic must never
|
||
|
have any dependency on the lower level platform-specific code.
|
||
|
The OS logic must be totally agnostic about its hardware
|
||
|
environment. Similarly, microcontroller-specific logic was be
|
||
|
completely ignorant of board-specific logic.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This strict layering is enforced in the NuttX build system by
|
||
|
controlling the compiler include paths: Higher level code can
|
||
|
never include header files from either; of the
|
||
|
platform-specific source directories; microcontroller-specific
|
||
|
code can never include header files from the board-specific
|
||
|
source directories. The board-specific directories are, then,
|
||
|
at the bottom of the layered hierarchy.
|
||
|
|
||
|
An exception to these inclusion restrictions is the
|
||
|
platform-specific *include/*. These are made available to
|
||
|
higher level OS logic. The microcontroller-specific include
|
||
|
directory will be linked at ``include/arch/chip`` and, hence,
|
||
|
can be included like ``#include <arch/hardware/chip.h``.
|
||
|
Similarly, the board-specific include directory will be linked
|
||
|
at ``include/arch/board`` and, hence, can be included like
|
||
|
``#include <arch/board/board.h``.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keeping in the spirit of the layered architecture, these
|
||
|
publicly visible header files must *not* export
|
||
|
platform-specific definitions; Only platform-specific
|
||
|
realizations of standardized declarations should be visible.
|
||
|
Those *standardized declarations* should appear in common
|
||
|
header files such as those provided by ``include/nuttx/arch.h``
|
||
|
and ``include/nuttx/board.h``. Similarly, these publicly
|
||
|
visible header file must *not* include files that reside in the
|
||
|
inaccessible platform-specific source directories. For example,
|
||
|
the board-specific
|
||
|
``boards/<arch>/<chip>/<board>/include/board.h`` header file
|
||
|
must never include microcontroller-specific header files that
|
||
|
reside in ``arch/<arch>/src/<mcu>``. That practice will cause
|
||
|
inclusion failures when the publicly visible file is included
|
||
|
in common logic outside of the platform-specific source
|
||
|
directories.
|
||
|
|