This makes the difference between "strict" and regular failures very
clear.
Stopping after non-strict failures is misleading, it can give the wrong
impression that there are very few warnings left.
Signed-off-by: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com>
This is a logical revert of eb45907
Based on recently merged #4941, C99 comments are now OK. I never found
any rationale or even written down coding style for excluding them in
the first place.
Signed-off-by: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com>
With the backported patch to checkpatch.pl the dictionary.txt location
should automagically found and no need to specify it by hand.
Suggested-by: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Lets not trust that everyone remembers to lint themselves or that they
fetch the repo in order to execute their job.
Also rename workflow file to be a bit more generic
Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org>
Marc Herbert