[ Upstream commit 271de525e1 ]
The commit 64696c40d0 ("bpf: Add __bpf_prog_{enter,exit}_struct_ops for struct_ops trampoline")
removed prog->active check for struct_ops prog. The bpf_lsm
and bpf_iter is also using trampoline. Like struct_ops, the bpf_lsm
and bpf_iter have fixed hooks for the prog to attach. The
kernel does not call the same hook in a recursive way.
This patch also removes the prog->active check for
bpf_lsm and bpf_iter.
A later patch has a test to reproduce the recursion issue
for a sleepable bpf_lsm program.
This patch appends the '_recur' naming to the existing
enter and exit functions that track the prog->active counter.
New __bpf_prog_{enter,exit}[_sleepable] function are
added to skip the prog->active tracking. The '_struct_ops'
version is also removed.
It also moves the decision on picking the enter and exit function to
the new bpf_trampoline_{enter,exit}(). It returns the '_recur' ones
for all tracing progs to use. For bpf_lsm, bpf_iter,
struct_ops (no prog->active tracking after 64696c40d0), and
bpf_lsm_cgroup (no prog->active tracking after 69fd337a97),
it will return the functions that don't track the prog->active.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-2-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 7645629f7d ("bpf: Invoke __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable_recur() on recursion in kern_sys_bpf().")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
a12f15d1f8