From e8a7bdb6f76cdaef4183669554ad76e5ed197d92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Naoya Horiguchi Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 17:20:04 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory.c: warn with pr_warn_ratelimited instead of VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO commit 4737edbbdd4958ae29ca6a310a6a2fa4e0684b01 upstream. split_huge_page_to_list() WARNs when called for huge zero pages, which sounds to me too harsh because it does not imply a kernel bug, but just notifies the event to admins. On the other hand, this is considered as critical by syzkaller and makes its testing less efficient, which seems to me harmful. So replace the VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO with pr_warn_ratelimited. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230406082004.2185420-1-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev Fixes: 478d134e9506 ("mm/huge_memory: do not overkill when splitting huge_zero_page") Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi Reported-by: syzbot+07a218429c8d19b1fb25@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000a6f34a05e6efcd01@google.com/ Reviewed-by: Yang Shi Cc: Miaohe Lin Cc: Tetsuo Handa Cc: Xu Yu Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- mm/huge_memory.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index cfe8d77af7ab..b20fef29e5bb 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -2655,9 +2655,10 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list) VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_large(folio), folio); is_hzp = is_huge_zero_page(&folio->page); - VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(is_hzp, folio); - if (is_hzp) + if (is_hzp) { + pr_warn_ratelimited("Called split_huge_page for huge zero page\n"); return -EBUSY; + } if (folio_test_writeback(folio)) return -EBUSY;