dlm: add __CHECKER__ for false positives

This patch will adds #ifndef __CHECKER__ for false positives warnings
about an imbalance lock/unlock srcu handling. Which are shown by running
sparse checks:

fs/dlm/midcomms.c:1065:20: warning: context imbalance in 'dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle' - wrong count at exit

Using __CHECKER__ will tell sparse to ignore these sections.

Those imbalances are false positive because from upper layer it is
always required to call a function in sequence, e.g. if
dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle() is successful there must be a
dlm_midcomms_commit_mhandle() call afterwards.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alexander Aring 2022-04-04 16:06:37 -04:00 committed by David Teigland
parent 314a5540ff
commit a8449f232e
2 changed files with 20 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -1303,6 +1303,10 @@ static struct dlm_msg *dlm_lowcomms_new_msg_con(struct connection *con, int len,
return msg;
}
/* avoid false positive for nodes_srcu, unlock happens in
* dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg which is a must call if success
*/
#ifndef __CHECKER__
struct dlm_msg *dlm_lowcomms_new_msg(int nodeid, int len, gfp_t allocation,
char **ppc, void (*cb)(void *data),
void *data)
@ -1336,6 +1340,7 @@ struct dlm_msg *dlm_lowcomms_new_msg(int nodeid, int len, gfp_t allocation,
msg->idx = idx;
return msg;
}
#endif
static void _dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg)
{
@ -1362,11 +1367,16 @@ static void _dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg)
return;
}
/* avoid false positive for nodes_srcu, lock was happen in
* dlm_lowcomms_new_msg
*/
#ifndef __CHECKER__
void dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg)
{
_dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(msg);
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, msg->idx);
}
#endif
void dlm_lowcomms_put_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg)
{

View File

@ -1062,6 +1062,10 @@ static struct dlm_msg *dlm_midcomms_get_msg_3_2(struct dlm_mhandle *mh, int node
return msg;
}
/* avoid false positive for nodes_srcu, unlock happens in
* dlm_midcomms_commit_mhandle which is a must call if success
*/
#ifndef __CHECKER__
struct dlm_mhandle *dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle(int nodeid, int len,
gfp_t allocation, char **ppc)
{
@ -1127,6 +1131,7 @@ struct dlm_mhandle *dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle(int nodeid, int len,
srcu_read_unlock(&nodes_srcu, idx);
return NULL;
}
#endif
static void dlm_midcomms_commit_msg_3_2(struct dlm_mhandle *mh)
{
@ -1136,6 +1141,10 @@ static void dlm_midcomms_commit_msg_3_2(struct dlm_mhandle *mh)
dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(mh->msg);
}
/* avoid false positive for nodes_srcu, lock was happen in
* dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle
*/
#ifndef __CHECKER__
void dlm_midcomms_commit_mhandle(struct dlm_mhandle *mh)
{
switch (mh->node->version) {
@ -1157,6 +1166,7 @@ void dlm_midcomms_commit_mhandle(struct dlm_mhandle *mh)
break;
}
}
#endif
int dlm_midcomms_start(void)
{