dma-buf/dma-resv: check if the new fence is really later
Previously when we added a fence to a dma_resv object we always assumed the the newer than all the existing fences. With Jason's work to add an UAPI to explicit export/import that's not necessary the case any more. So without this check we would allow userspace to force the kernel into an use after free error. Since the change is very small and defensive it's probably a good idea to backport this to stable kernels as well just in case others are using the dma_resv object in the same way. Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@collabora.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220810172617.140047-1-christian.koenig@amd.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.19+
This commit is contained in:
parent
6b04ce966a
commit
a3f7c10a26
|
@ -295,7 +295,8 @@ void dma_resv_add_fence(struct dma_resv *obj, struct dma_fence *fence,
|
|||
enum dma_resv_usage old_usage;
|
||||
|
||||
dma_resv_list_entry(fobj, i, obj, &old, &old_usage);
|
||||
if ((old->context == fence->context && old_usage >= usage) ||
|
||||
if ((old->context == fence->context && old_usage >= usage &&
|
||||
dma_fence_is_later(fence, old)) ||
|
||||
dma_fence_is_signaled(old)) {
|
||||
dma_resv_list_set(fobj, i, fence, usage);
|
||||
dma_fence_put(old);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue