landlock: Add design choices documentation for filesystem access rights
Summarize the rationale of filesystem access rights according to the file type. Update the document date. Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220506161102.525323-13-mic@digikod.net
This commit is contained in:
parent
09340cf413
commit
9e0c76b9f1
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Landlock LSM: kernel documentation
|
|||
==================================
|
||||
|
||||
:Author: Mickaël Salaün
|
||||
:Date: March 2021
|
||||
:Date: May 2022
|
||||
|
||||
Landlock's goal is to create scoped access-control (i.e. sandboxing). To
|
||||
harden a whole system, this feature should be available to any process,
|
||||
|
@ -42,6 +42,21 @@ Guiding principles for safe access controls
|
|||
* Computation related to Landlock operations (e.g. enforcing a ruleset) shall
|
||||
only impact the processes requesting them.
|
||||
|
||||
Design choices
|
||||
==============
|
||||
|
||||
Filesystem access rights
|
||||
------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
All access rights are tied to an inode and what can be accessed through it.
|
||||
Reading the content of a directory doesn't imply to be allowed to read the
|
||||
content of a listed inode. Indeed, a file name is local to its parent
|
||||
directory, and an inode can be referenced by multiple file names thanks to
|
||||
(hard) links. Being able to unlink a file only has a direct impact on the
|
||||
directory, not the unlinked inode. This is the reason why
|
||||
`LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_FILE` or `LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER` are not allowed
|
||||
to be tied to files but only to directories.
|
||||
|
||||
Tests
|
||||
=====
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue