mm, mremap: fix mremap() expanding for vma's with vm_ops->close()
commitd014cd7c1c
upstream. Fabian has reported another regression in 6.1 due toca3d76b0aa
("mm: add merging after mremap resize"). The problem is that vma_merge() can fail when vma has a vm_ops->close() method, causing is_mergeable_vma() test to be negative. This was happening for vma mapping a file from fuse-overlayfs, which does have the method. But when we are simply expanding the vma, we never remove it due to the "merge" with the added area, so the test should not prevent the expansion. As a quick fix, check for such vmas and expand them using vma_adjust() directly as was done before commitca3d76b0aa
. For a more robust long term solution we should try to limit the check for vma_ops->close only to cases that actually result in vma removal, so that no merge would be prevented unnecessarily. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix indenting whitespace, reflow comment] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230117101939.9753-1-vbabka@suse.cz Fixes:ca3d76b0aa
("mm: add merging after mremap resize") Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reported-by: Fabian Vogt <fvogt@suse.com> Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206359#c35 Tested-by: Fabian Vogt <fvogt@suse.com> Cc: Jakub Matěna <matenajakub@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
acb08187b5
commit
97f17a7372
25
mm/mremap.c
25
mm/mremap.c
|
@ -1027,16 +1027,29 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(mremap, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, old_len,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Function vma_merge() is called on the extension we are adding to
|
||||
* the already existing vma, vma_merge() will merge this extension with
|
||||
* the already existing vma (expand operation itself) and possibly also
|
||||
* with the next vma if it becomes adjacent to the expanded vma and
|
||||
* otherwise compatible.
|
||||
* Function vma_merge() is called on the extension we
|
||||
* are adding to the already existing vma, vma_merge()
|
||||
* will merge this extension with the already existing
|
||||
* vma (expand operation itself) and possibly also with
|
||||
* the next vma if it becomes adjacent to the expanded
|
||||
* vma and otherwise compatible.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* However, vma_merge() can currently fail due to
|
||||
* is_mergeable_vma() check for vm_ops->close (see the
|
||||
* comment there). Yet this should not prevent vma
|
||||
* expanding, so perform a simple expand for such vma.
|
||||
* Ideally the check for close op should be only done
|
||||
* when a vma would be actually removed due to a merge.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
vma = vma_merge(mm, vma, extension_start, extension_end,
|
||||
if (!vma->vm_ops || !vma->vm_ops->close) {
|
||||
vma = vma_merge(mm, vma, extension_start, extension_end,
|
||||
vma->vm_flags, vma->anon_vma, vma->vm_file,
|
||||
extension_pgoff, vma_policy(vma),
|
||||
vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx, anon_vma_name(vma));
|
||||
} else if (vma_adjust(vma, vma->vm_start, addr + new_len,
|
||||
vma->vm_pgoff, NULL)) {
|
||||
vma = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!vma) {
|
||||
vm_unacct_memory(pages);
|
||||
ret = -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue