dm-integrity, dm-verity: reduce stack usage for recheck
commit 66ad2fbcdbeab0edfd40c5d94f32f053b98c2320 upstream. The newly added integrity_recheck() function has another larger stack allocation, just like its caller integrity_metadata(). When it gets inlined, the combination of the two exceeds the warning limit for 32-bit architectures and possibly risks an overflow when this is called from a deep call chain through a file system: drivers/md/dm-integrity.c:1767:13: error: stack frame size (1048) exceeds limit (1024) in 'integrity_metadata' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] 1767 | static void integrity_metadata(struct work_struct *w) Since the caller at this point is done using its checksum buffer, just reuse the same buffer in the new function to avoid the double allocation. [Mikulas: add "noinline" to integrity_recheck and verity_recheck. These functions are only called on error, so they shouldn't bloat the stack frame or code size of the caller.] Fixes: c88f5e553fe3 ("dm-integrity: recheck the integrity tag after a failure") Fixes: 9177f3c0dea6 ("dm-verity: recheck the hash after a failure") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
545a94ffc2
commit
943c8b1fcc
|
@ -1701,14 +1701,13 @@ static void integrity_sector_checksum(struct dm_integrity_c *ic, sector_t sector
|
|||
get_random_bytes(result, ic->tag_size);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void integrity_recheck(struct dm_integrity_io *dio)
|
||||
static noinline void integrity_recheck(struct dm_integrity_io *dio, char *checksum)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bio *bio = dm_bio_from_per_bio_data(dio, sizeof(struct dm_integrity_io));
|
||||
struct dm_integrity_c *ic = dio->ic;
|
||||
struct bvec_iter iter;
|
||||
struct bio_vec bv;
|
||||
sector_t sector, logical_sector, area, offset;
|
||||
char checksum_onstack[max_t(size_t, HASH_MAX_DIGESTSIZE, MAX_TAG_SIZE)];
|
||||
struct page *page;
|
||||
void *buffer;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1744,9 +1743,8 @@ static void integrity_recheck(struct dm_integrity_io *dio)
|
|||
goto free_ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
integrity_sector_checksum(ic, logical_sector, buffer,
|
||||
checksum_onstack);
|
||||
r = dm_integrity_rw_tag(ic, checksum_onstack, &dio->metadata_block,
|
||||
integrity_sector_checksum(ic, logical_sector, buffer, checksum);
|
||||
r = dm_integrity_rw_tag(ic, checksum, &dio->metadata_block,
|
||||
&dio->metadata_offset, ic->tag_size, TAG_CMP);
|
||||
if (r) {
|
||||
if (r > 0) {
|
||||
|
@ -1859,7 +1857,7 @@ static void integrity_metadata(struct work_struct *w)
|
|||
checksums_ptr - checksums, dio->op == REQ_OP_READ ? TAG_CMP : TAG_WRITE);
|
||||
if (unlikely(r)) {
|
||||
if (r > 0) {
|
||||
integrity_recheck(dio);
|
||||
integrity_recheck(dio, checksums);
|
||||
goto skip_io;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (likely(checksums != checksums_onstack))
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -483,8 +483,8 @@ static int verity_recheck_copy(struct dm_verity *v, struct dm_verity_io *io,
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int verity_recheck(struct dm_verity *v, struct dm_verity_io *io,
|
||||
struct bvec_iter start, sector_t cur_block)
|
||||
static noinline int verity_recheck(struct dm_verity *v, struct dm_verity_io *io,
|
||||
struct bvec_iter start, sector_t cur_block)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct page *page;
|
||||
void *buffer;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue