rcu-tasks: Fix synchronize_rcu_tasks() VS zap_pid_ns_processes()
[ Upstream commit28319d6dc5
] RCU Tasks and PID-namespace unshare can interact in do_exit() in a complicated circular dependency: 1) TASK A calls unshare(CLONE_NEWPID), this creates a new PID namespace that every subsequent child of TASK A will belong to. But TASK A doesn't itself belong to that new PID namespace. 2) TASK A forks() and creates TASK B. TASK A stays attached to its PID namespace (let's say PID_NS1) and TASK B is the first task belonging to the new PID namespace created by unshare() (let's call it PID_NS2). 3) Since TASK B is the first task attached to PID_NS2, it becomes the PID_NS2 child reaper. 4) TASK A forks() again and creates TASK C which get attached to PID_NS2. Note how TASK C has TASK A as a parent (belonging to PID_NS1) but has TASK B (belonging to PID_NS2) as a pid_namespace child_reaper. 5) TASK B exits and since it is the child reaper for PID_NS2, it has to kill all other tasks attached to PID_NS2, and wait for all of them to die before getting reaped itself (zap_pid_ns_process()). 6) TASK A calls synchronize_rcu_tasks() which leads to synchronize_srcu(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu). 7) TASK B is waiting for TASK C to get reaped. But TASK B is under a tasks_rcu_exit_srcu SRCU critical section (exit_notify() is between exit_tasks_rcu_start() and exit_tasks_rcu_finish()), blocking TASK A. 8) TASK C exits and since TASK A is its parent, it waits for it to reap TASK C, but it can't because TASK A waits for TASK B that waits for TASK C. Pid_namespace semantics can hardly be changed at this point. But the coverage of tasks_rcu_exit_srcu can be reduced instead. The current task is assumed not to be concurrently reapable at this stage of exit_notify() and therefore tasks_rcu_exit_srcu can be temporarily relaxed without breaking its constraints, providing a way out of the deadlock scenario. [ paulmck: Fix build failure by adding additional declaration. ] Fixes:3f95aa81d2
("rcu: Make TASKS_RCU handle tasks that are almost done exiting") Reported-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com> Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Cc: Eric W . Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
24f259ce3a
commit
62030a4915
|
@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude(void);
|
|||
|
||||
#define rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(t) rcu_tasks_qs(t, false)
|
||||
void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void);
|
||||
void exit_tasks_rcu_stop(void);
|
||||
void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void);
|
||||
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_GENERIC */
|
||||
#define rcu_tasks_classic_qs(t, preempt) do { } while (0)
|
||||
|
@ -237,6 +238,7 @@ void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void);
|
|||
#define call_rcu_tasks call_rcu
|
||||
#define synchronize_rcu_tasks synchronize_rcu
|
||||
static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void) { }
|
||||
static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_stop(void) { }
|
||||
static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { }
|
||||
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_GENERIC */
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -244,7 +244,24 @@ void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
|
|||
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||||
if (pid_ns->pid_allocated == init_pids)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Release tasks_rcu_exit_srcu to avoid following deadlock:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1) TASK A unshare(CLONE_NEWPID)
|
||||
* 2) TASK A fork() twice -> TASK B (child reaper for new ns)
|
||||
* and TASK C
|
||||
* 3) TASK B exits, kills TASK C, waits for TASK A to reap it
|
||||
* 4) TASK A calls synchronize_rcu_tasks()
|
||||
* -> synchronize_srcu(tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
|
||||
* 5) *DEADLOCK*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It is considered safe to release tasks_rcu_exit_srcu here
|
||||
* because we assume the current task can not be concurrently
|
||||
* reaped at this point.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
exit_tasks_rcu_stop();
|
||||
schedule();
|
||||
exit_tasks_rcu_start();
|
||||
}
|
||||
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1016,16 +1016,27 @@ void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void) __acquires(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
|
|||
* task is exiting and may be removed from the tasklist. See
|
||||
* corresponding synchronize_srcu() for further details.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) __releases(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
|
||||
void exit_tasks_rcu_stop(void) __releases(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *t = current;
|
||||
|
||||
__srcu_read_unlock(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu, t->rcu_tasks_idx);
|
||||
exit_tasks_rcu_finish_trace(t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Contribute to protect against tasklist scan blind spot while the
|
||||
* task is exiting and may be removed from the tasklist. See
|
||||
* corresponding synchronize_srcu() for further details.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
exit_tasks_rcu_stop();
|
||||
exit_tasks_rcu_finish_trace(current);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */
|
||||
void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void) { }
|
||||
void exit_tasks_rcu_stop(void) { }
|
||||
void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { exit_tasks_rcu_finish_trace(current); }
|
||||
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue