genirq: Don't suspend nested_thread irqs over system suspend
Nested IRQs can only fire when the parent irq fires. So when the parent is suspended, there is no need to suspend the child irq. Suspending nested irqs can cause a problem is they are suspended or resumed in the wrong order. If an interrupt fires while the parent is active but the child is suspended, then the interrupt will not be acknowledged properly and so an interrupt storm can result. This is particularly likely if the parent is resumed before the child, and the interrupt was raised during suspend. Ensuring correct ordering would be possible, but it is simpler to just never suspend nested interrupts. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name> Cc: GTA04 owners <gta04-owner@goldelico.com> Cc: Kalle Jokiniemi <kalle.jokiniemi@jollamobile.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150517151934.2393e8f8@notabene.brown Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
63781394c5
commit
3c646f2c6a
|
@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ void suspend_device_irqs(void)
|
|||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
bool sync;
|
||||
|
||||
if (irq_settings_is_nested_thread(desc))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
|
||||
sync = suspend_device_irq(desc, irq);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
|
||||
|
@ -163,6 +165,8 @@ static void resume_irqs(bool want_early)
|
|||
|
||||
if (!is_early && want_early)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (irq_settings_is_nested_thread(desc))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
|
||||
resume_irq(desc, irq);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue