mm/oom_kill: change comment and rename is_dump_unreclaim_slabs()
Change the comment of is_dump_unreclaim_slabs(), it just check whether nr_unreclaimable slabs amount is greater than user memory, and explain why we dump unreclaim slabs. Rename it to should_dump_unreclaim_slab() maybe better. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201030182704.GA53949@rlk Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2271b016bf
commit
259b3633e7
|
@ -170,11 +170,13 @@ static bool oom_unkillable_task(struct task_struct *p)
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Print out unreclaimble slabs info when unreclaimable slabs amount is greater
|
||||
* than all user memory (LRU pages)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static bool is_dump_unreclaim_slabs(void)
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Check whether unreclaimable slab amount is greater than
|
||||
* all user memory(LRU pages).
|
||||
* dump_unreclaimable_slab() could help in the case that
|
||||
* oom due to too much unreclaimable slab used by kernel.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static bool should_dump_unreclaim_slab(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long nr_lru;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -463,7 +465,7 @@ static void dump_header(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p)
|
|||
mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo(oc->memcg);
|
||||
else {
|
||||
show_mem(SHOW_MEM_FILTER_NODES, oc->nodemask);
|
||||
if (is_dump_unreclaim_slabs())
|
||||
if (should_dump_unreclaim_slab())
|
||||
dump_unreclaimable_slab();
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (sysctl_oom_dump_tasks)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue