arm64: mm: fix p?d_leaf()

The pmd_leaf() is used to test a leaf mapped PMD, however, it misses
the PROT_NONE mapped PMD on arm64.  Fix it.  A real world issue [1]
caused by this was reported by Qian Cai. Also fix pud_leaf().

Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/comment/24798260/ [1]
Fixes: 8aa82df3c1 ("arm64: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions")
Reported-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422060033.48711-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Muchun Song 2022-04-22 14:00:33 +08:00 committed by Will Deacon
parent 0ff74a23e0
commit 23bc8f69f0
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ extern pgprot_t phys_mem_access_prot(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn,
PMD_TYPE_TABLE)
#define pmd_sect(pmd) ((pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TYPE_MASK) == \
PMD_TYPE_SECT)
#define pmd_leaf(pmd) pmd_sect(pmd)
#define pmd_leaf(pmd) (pmd_present(pmd) && !pmd_table(pmd))
#define pmd_bad(pmd) (!pmd_table(pmd))
#define pmd_leaf_size(pmd) (pmd_cont(pmd) ? CONT_PMD_SIZE : PMD_SIZE)
@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static inline unsigned long pmd_page_vaddr(pmd_t pmd)
#define pud_none(pud) (!pud_val(pud))
#define pud_bad(pud) (!pud_table(pud))
#define pud_present(pud) pte_present(pud_pte(pud))
#define pud_leaf(pud) pud_sect(pud)
#define pud_leaf(pud) (pud_present(pud) && !pud_table(pud))
#define pud_valid(pud) pte_valid(pud_pte(pud))
static inline void set_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud)