xfrm: Treat already-verified secpath entries as optional
This change allows inbound traffic through nested IPsec tunnels to successfully match policies and templates, while retaining the secpath stack trace as necessary for netfilter policies. Specifically, this patch marks secpath entries that have already matched against a relevant policy as having been verified, allowing it to be treated as optional and skipped after a tunnel decapsulation (during which the src/dst/proto/etc may have changed, and the correct policy chain no long be resolvable). This approach is taken as opposed to the iteration inb0355dbbf1
, where the secpath was cleared, since that breaks subsequent validations that rely on the existence of the secpath entries (netfilter policies, or transport-in-tunnel mode, where policies remain resolvable). Fixes:b0355dbbf1
("Fix XFRM-I support for nested ESP tunnels") Test: Tested against Android Kernel Unit Tests Test: Tested against Android CTS Signed-off-by: Benedict Wong <benedictwong@google.com> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
67caf26d76
commit
1f8b6df6a9
|
@ -1054,6 +1054,7 @@ struct xfrm_offload {
|
|||
struct sec_path {
|
||||
int len;
|
||||
int olen;
|
||||
int verified_cnt;
|
||||
|
||||
struct xfrm_state *xvec[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH];
|
||||
struct xfrm_offload ovec[XFRM_MAX_OFFLOAD_DEPTH];
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ struct sec_path *secpath_set(struct sk_buff *skb)
|
|||
memset(sp->ovec, 0, sizeof(sp->ovec));
|
||||
sp->olen = 0;
|
||||
sp->len = 0;
|
||||
sp->verified_cnt = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
return sp;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3349,6 +3349,13 @@ xfrm_policy_ok(const struct xfrm_tmpl *tmpl, const struct sec_path *sp, int star
|
|||
if (xfrm_state_ok(tmpl, sp->xvec[idx], family, if_id))
|
||||
return ++idx;
|
||||
if (sp->xvec[idx]->props.mode != XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT) {
|
||||
if (idx < sp->verified_cnt) {
|
||||
/* Secpath entry previously verified, consider optional and
|
||||
* continue searching
|
||||
*/
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (start == -1)
|
||||
start = -2-idx;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -3723,6 +3730,9 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
|||
* Order is _important_. Later we will implement
|
||||
* some barriers, but at the moment barriers
|
||||
* are implied between each two transformations.
|
||||
* Upon success, marks secpath entries as having been
|
||||
* verified to allow them to be skipped in future policy
|
||||
* checks (e.g. nested tunnels).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (i = xfrm_nr-1, k = 0; i >= 0; i--) {
|
||||
k = xfrm_policy_ok(tpp[i], sp, k, family, if_id);
|
||||
|
@ -3741,6 +3751,8 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
xfrm_pols_put(pols, npols);
|
||||
sp->verified_cnt = k;
|
||||
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINPOLBLOCK);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue