sched/cpuacct: Use __this_cpu_add() instead of this_cpu_ptr()
The cpuacct_charge() and cpuacct_account_field() are called with rq->lock held, and this means preemption(and IRQs) are indeed disabled, so it is safe to use __this_cpu_*() to allow for better code-generation. Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200507031039.32615-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
7d148be69e
commit
12aa258738
|
@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ void cpuacct_charge(struct task_struct *tsk, u64 cputime)
|
|||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
|
||||
for (ca = task_ca(tsk); ca; ca = parent_ca(ca))
|
||||
this_cpu_ptr(ca->cpuusage)->usages[index] += cputime;
|
||||
__this_cpu_add(ca->cpuusage->usages[index], cputime);
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ void cpuacct_account_field(struct task_struct *tsk, int index, u64 val)
|
|||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
for (ca = task_ca(tsk); ca != &root_cpuacct; ca = parent_ca(ca))
|
||||
this_cpu_ptr(ca->cpustat)->cpustat[index] += val;
|
||||
__this_cpu_add(ca->cpustat->cpustat[index], val);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue