tick/common: Align tick period during sched_timer setup

commit 13bb06f8dd upstream.

The tick period is aligned very early while the first clock_event_device is
registered. At that point the system runs in periodic mode and switches
later to one-shot mode if possible.

The next wake-up event is programmed based on the aligned value
(tick_next_period) but the delta value, that is used to program the
clock_event_device, is computed based on ktime_get().

With the subtracted offset, the device fires earlier than the exact time
frame. With a large enough offset the system programs the timer for the
next wake-up and the remaining time left is too small to make any boot
progress. The system hangs.

Move the alignment later to the setup of tick_sched timer. At this point
the system switches to oneshot mode and a high resolution clocksource is
available. At this point it is safe to align tick_next_period because
ktime_get() will now return accurate (not jiffies based) time.

[bigeasy: Patch description + testing].

Fixes: e9523a0d81 ("tick/common: Align tick period with the HZ tick.")
Reported-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
Reported-by: "Bhatnagar, Rishabh" <risbhat@amazon.com>
Suggested-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
Acked-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/5a56290d-806e-b9a5-f37c-f21958b5a8c0@grsecurity.net
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/12c6f9a3-d087-b824-0d05-0d18c9bc1bf3@amazon.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230615091830.RxMV2xf_@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner 2023-06-15 11:18:30 +02:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 854156d12c
commit 0c6552f837
2 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -218,19 +218,8 @@ static void tick_setup_device(struct tick_device *td,
* this cpu: * this cpu:
*/ */
if (tick_do_timer_cpu == TICK_DO_TIMER_BOOT) { if (tick_do_timer_cpu == TICK_DO_TIMER_BOOT) {
ktime_t next_p;
u32 rem;
tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu; tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu;
tick_next_period = ktime_get();
next_p = ktime_get();
div_u64_rem(next_p, TICK_NSEC, &rem);
if (rem) {
next_p -= rem;
next_p += TICK_NSEC;
}
tick_next_period = next_p;
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
/* /*
* The boot CPU may be nohz_full, in which case set * The boot CPU may be nohz_full, in which case set

View File

@ -161,8 +161,19 @@ static ktime_t tick_init_jiffy_update(void)
raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock); raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock);
write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq); write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq);
/* Did we start the jiffies update yet ? */ /* Did we start the jiffies update yet ? */
if (last_jiffies_update == 0) if (last_jiffies_update == 0) {
u32 rem;
/*
* Ensure that the tick is aligned to a multiple of
* TICK_NSEC.
*/
div_u64_rem(tick_next_period, TICK_NSEC, &rem);
if (rem)
tick_next_period += TICK_NSEC - rem;
last_jiffies_update = tick_next_period; last_jiffies_update = tick_next_period;
}
period = last_jiffies_update; period = last_jiffies_update;
write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq); write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq);
raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock); raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock);