The ve820 table' hpa1_low area is divided into two parts, which
is making the code too complicated and causing problems. Moving
the entries that divides the hpa1_low could make things easier.
This patch moves the GPU OpRegion to the tail area of 2G,
consecutive to the acpi data/nvs area.
before:
|<---low_1M--->|
|<---hpa1_low_part1--->|
|<---SSRAM--->|
|<---GPU_OpRegion--->|
|<---hpa1_low_part2--->|
|<---ACPI DATA--->|
|<---ACPI NVS--->|
---2G---
after:
|<---low_1M--->|
|<---hpa1_low_part1--->|
|<---SSRAM--->|
|<---hpa1_low_part2--->|
|<---GPU_OpRegion--->|
|<---ACPI DATA--->|
|<---ACPI NVS--->|
---2G---
Tracked-On: #6674
Signed-off-by: Zhou, Wu <wu.zhou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Victor Sun <victor.sun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Wang, Yu1 <yu1.wang@intel.com>
The length of the ACPI data entry in ve820 tab was 960K, while the
ACPI file is 1MB. It causes the ACPI file copy failed due to reserved
ACPI regions in ve820 table is not enough when loading pre-launched
VMs. This patch changes ACPI data area to 1MB to fix the problem.
And the ACPI data length was missed when calculating
ENTRY_HPA1_LOW_PART2 length. Fixed here too.
Also adds some refinement to the hard-coded ACPI base/addr definations
Tracked-On: #6674
Signed-off-by: Zhou, Wu <wu.zhou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Wang, Yu1 <yu1.wang@intel.com>
Rename gpa_uos to gpa_user_vm
rename base_gpa_in_uos to base_gpa_in_user_vm
rename UOS_VIRT_PCI_MMCFG_BASE to USER_VM_VIRT_PCI_MMCFG_BASE
rename UOS_VIRT_PCI_MMCFG_START_BUS to USER_VM_VIRT_PCI_MMCFG_START_BUS
rename UOS_VIRT_PCI_MMCFG_END_BUS to USER_VM_VIRT_PCI_MMCFG_END_BUS
rename UOS_VIRT_PCI_MEMBASE32 to USER_VM_VIRT_PCI_MEMBASE32
rename UOS_VIRT_PCI_MEMLIMIT32 to USER_VM_VIRT_PCI_MEMLIMIT32
rename UOS_VIRT_PCI_MEMBASE64 to USER_VM_VIRT_PCI_MEMBASE64
rename UOS_VIRT_PCI_MEMLIMIT64 to USER_VM_VIRT_PCI_MEMLIMIT64
rename UOS in comments message to User VM.
Tracked-On: #6744
Signed-off-by: Liu Long <long.liu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Geoffroy Van Cutsem <geoffroy.vancutsem@intel.com>
Relocate ACPI address to 0x7fe00000 and ACPI NVS to 0x7ff00000 correspondingly.
In this case, we could include TPM event log region [0x7ffb0000, 0x80000000)
into ACPI NVS.
Tracked-On: #6320
Signed-off-by: Fei Li <fei1.li@intel.com>
When guest doing BAR re-programming, we should check whether
the base address of the BAR is valid.This patch does this check by:
1. whether the gpa is located in the responding MMIO window
2. whether the gpa is aligned with the BAR size
Tracked-On: #6011
Signed-off-by: Tao Yuhong <yuhong.tao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Fei <fei1.li@intel.com>
Per PCI Firmware Specification Revision 3.0, 4.1.2. MCFG Table Description:
Memory Mapped Enhanced Configuration Space Base Address Allocation Structure
assign the Start Bus Number and the End Bus Number which could decoded by the
Host Bridge. We should not access the PCI device which bus number outside of
the range of [Start Bus Number, End Bus Number).
For ACRN, we should:
1. Don't detect PCI device which bus number outside the range of
[Start Bus Number, End Bus Number) of MCFG ACPI Table.
2. Only trap the ECAM MMIO size: [MMCFG_BASE_ADDRESS, MMCFG_BASE_ADDRESS +
(End Bus Number - Start Bus Number + 1) * 0x100000) for SOS.
Tracked-On: #5233
Signed-off-by: Li Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
The old method of build pre-launched VM vacpi by HV source code is deprecated,
so remove related source code;
Tracked-On: #5266
Signed-off-by: Victor Sun <victor.sun@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Previously we use a pre-defined structure as vACPI table for pre-launched
VM, the structure is initialized by HV code. Now change the method to use a
pre-loaded multiboot module instead. The module file will be generated by
acrn-config tool and loaded to GPA 0x7ff00000, a hardcoded RSDP table at
GPA 0x000f2400 will point to the XSDT table which at GPA 0x7ff00080;
Tracked-On: #5266
Signed-off-by: Victor Sun <victor.sun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuang Zheng <shuang.zheng@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Previously the ACPI table was stored in F segment which might not be big
enough for a customized ACPI table, hence reserve 1MB space in pre-launched
VM e820 table to store the ACPI related data:
0x7ff00000 ~ 0x7ffeffff : ACPI Reclaim memory
0x7fff0000 ~ 0x7fffffff : ACPI NVS memory
Tracked-On: #5266
Signed-off-by: Victor Sun <victor.sun@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
On WHL platform, we need to pass through TPM to Secure pre-launched VM. In order
to do this, we need to add TPM2 ACPI Table and add TPM DSDT ACPI table to include
the _CRS.
Now we only support the TPM 2.0 device (TPM 1.2 device is not support). Besides,
the TPM must use Start Method 7 (Uses the Command Response Buffer Interface)
to notify the TPM 2.0 device that a command is available for processing.
Tracked-On: #5053
Signed-off-by: Li Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
Add FADT table support to support guest S5 setting.
According to ACPI 6.3 Spec, OSPM must ignored the DSDT and FACS fields if them're zero.
However, Linux kernel seems not to abide by the protocol, it will check DSDT still.
So add an empty DSDT to meet it.
Tracked-On: #4623
Signed-off-by: Li Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
rename the macro since MAX_PCPU_NUM could be parsed from board file and
it is not a configurable item anymore.
Tracked-On: #4230
Signed-off-by: Victor Sun <victor.sun@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
-- remove some unnecessary includes
-- fix a typo
-- remove unnecessary void before launch_vms
Tracked-On: #1842
Signed-off-by: Mingqiang Chi <mingqiang.chi@intel.com>
Statically define the per vm RSDP/XSDT/MADT ACPI template tables in vacpi.c,
RSDP/XSDT tables are copied to guest physical memory after checksum is
calculated. For MADT table, first fix up process id/lapic id in its lapic
subtable, then the MADT table's checksum is calculated before it is copies to
guest physical memory.
Add 8-bit checksum function in util.h
Tracked-On: #3601
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>