Fix violations for function whose parameter can be read-only.
Tracked-On: #861
Signed-off-by: Huihuang Shi <huihuang.shi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Anthony Xu <anthony.xu@intel.com>
Add the brackets for Macro parameter to avoid the unintentional
mistakes.
A simple example that may cause mistakes:
#define minus(x) -x
When the following call is made,
z = minus(a-b)
it becomes:
z = -a-b;
where "-a - b" is equivalent to "(-a) - b" rather than "- (a - b)", as
expected.
v2 -> v3:
* convert DMAR_WAIT_COMPLETION to inline function
* remove the macro PIC_PIN_FOREACH and implement the well-formed
for loop in each case
* replace __CPP_STRING with STRINGIFY and remove the unused CPP_STRING
v1 -> v2:
* Remove some changes to function like macro since MISRA-C requires to
use inline functions if it is possible.
These MACRO brackets violations will be fixed together when fixing
other issues related to function like macro.
Tracked-On: #861
Signed-off-by: Shiqing Gao <shiqing.gao@intel.com>
V1:
In order to remove MISRA C violations for rule
219S, rename functions, macros whose name
starts with "_".
Also removed some __mmio functions because they are
duplicates and are not used anywhere.
Renamed functions like __assert, to asm_assert,
because they were only wrappers around asm calls.
V2:
Over and above the changes on V1, modified bitmap
functions names to lock (corresponding to unlock)
introduced in V1
Signed-off-by: Arindam Roy <arindam.roy@intel.com>
MISRA C explicit required expression should be boolean when
in branch statements (if,while...).
Signed-off-by: Huihuang Shi <huihuang.shi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Huihuang Shi