dm: virtio-block: support NO_NOTIFY
disable NOTIFY during getting requests from virtqueue. This will improve the IO performance. Tracked-On: #7940 Signed-off-by: Conghui <conghui.chen@intel.com> Acked-by: Wang, Yu1 <yu1.wang@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1bf3cb61f5
commit
7d987f9b0f
|
@ -380,8 +380,29 @@ virtio_blk_notify(void *vdev, struct virtio_vq_info *vq)
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct virtio_blk *blk = vdev;
|
||||
|
||||
while (vq_has_descs(vq))
|
||||
virtio_blk_proc(blk, vq);
|
||||
if (!vq_has_descs(vq))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The two while loop here is to avoid the race:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* FE could send a request right after the BE break from internal while loop.
|
||||
* At that time, FE still not aware the NO_NOTIFY is clear, so send the request
|
||||
* without notification. This request would be lost.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* So, after enable NOTIFY, need to check the queue again to dry the
|
||||
* requests in virtqueue.
|
||||
* */
|
||||
do {
|
||||
vq->used->flags |= VRING_USED_F_NO_NOTIFY;
|
||||
mb();
|
||||
do {
|
||||
virtio_blk_proc(blk, vq);
|
||||
} while (vq_has_descs(vq));
|
||||
|
||||
vq_clear_used_ring_flags(&blk->base, vq);
|
||||
mb();
|
||||
} while (vq_has_descs(vq));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static uint64_t
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue